Just when you thought, you heard it all, you look up and lo and behold
there's a picture on the TV screen of a book with a headline, “Harmful to
So, naturally this caught my attention. I expected I might hear something
new, rather than the oft-repeated -- too much sugar is bad for their
teeth, or too many children are taking Ritalin for Attention Deficit
or obesity is running amok in our children -- not that I take these lightly.
So, I'm always willing to learn -- just what is this new thing that is
to children. Surely it must be earth shattering for someone to write a book
about it and to be on Bill O'Reilly's “O’Reilly Factor.”(Fox News)
Well, hold on to your hat, or sit down, or do whatever you do to brace
yourself when you are about to receive news that will make you want to
shout to the high Heavens -- “stop the planet I want to get off.”
It seems that the title, “Harmful to Children,” refers to the fact that NOT
having sex is harmful to children. You read correctly -- children need sex.
The author, Judith Levine, an ultra-liberal and self-described "feminist
guerilla," who majored in perverse,
has acknowledged finding a nude picture of a three-year old "sexy."
This author, who has got to be a kin to satan, otherwise how else can one
explain this disgusting book, was not present to push her book on the
Instead, the former Surgeon General of the United States, Dr. Jocelyn
Elders, appointed by Bill Clinton, and who wrote the forward for the book
was there. The book is due to come out in May.
If you remember, Elders was dismissed by Clinton for encouraging children
to masturbate. For Clinton to fire someone over a sexual matter is akin to
well I digress.
During the course of this TV show, O’Reilly read a few of the statements
taken directly from the book, such as “Sex is not harmful for children
and is a vehicle for self knowledge.” If that one doesn’t disturb you, how
about, “The threat of pedophilia and sexual molestation is exaggerated in
I'm listening to this and I almost have to pinch myself to make sure I'm
not dreaming. And there is Jocelyn Elders, with a big smile on her face
denying everything O’Reilly is saying.
O’Reilly: “But, it's right here in the book, I'm reading it right from the
Elders: “You are reading it out of context. You have to read the whole book.”
O’Reilly then reads another sentence, “ sexual contact with a child does
not a pedophile make.” He then said, “this is a vile piece of work.
who does this is a criminal. She's excusing adult sexual exploitation of
Elders kept insisting, “you have to read the whole book. It's not what she
O’Reilly: “Yes it is.”
Elders: “I disagree.”
O’Reilly: “I don't know how you can -- I'm quoting it right from the book.”
Then he said with his eyes bulging out and getting angrier by the second
and waving his index finger at Elders, although she was not in the same
studio, “she's exploiting sex with a child. She excuses pedophilia.”
He then read from page 225: “sex is not harmful to children. It's a vehicle
to self knowledge, love, feeling, creativity, adventure and intense feeling
There are many ways in which even the smallest child can partake of sex.
We relish our erotic attraction to children.”
With Elders shaking her head in disagreement, O’Reilly said angrily, “I
relish that. That’s perversion.”
Throughout this entire discourse, Elders kept defending the book, and
always with a smile on her face. Why the smile? She was being hammered
I do believe that smiling when you have no valid answer must be in the
playbook of liberals, or anyone else who try to defend the indefensible.
In other words, when you are cornered and have no answer that makes
sense -- smile.
When Gloria Feldt, president of Planned Parenthood, was on TV recently,
she constantly had a grin from ear to ear, getting wider and wider, when her
arguments appeared headed into the toilet.
Elders said, “we refuse to educate our children and prepare them for
all this sex we're putting on them. The have to be better educated,
sexually. We can encourage those feelings. Children can enjoy their bodies.”
O’Reilly, shaking the paper from which he was reading, said, “She's
(Levine) encouraging children to have sex. She's encouraging public
authorities to say that, and you attach your name and expertise to this
“No, it's not saying that.” Elders said, again with that big smile.
I just couldn't get over her constant smile. This was no laughing, or
smiling matter. O’Reilly was not smiling. I never saw him so serious.
He went on to read other quotes from the book, one of which was:
“Comprehensive non-abstinence sex education works and Abstinence
education does not.”
O’Reily closed by saying, “this book excuses pedophilia and encourages
children to have sex and it is very very dangerous, I’ll give you the last
Elders: I disagree, I don't think this book encourages pedophilia. Our
children do have feelings and we should encourage those feeling and not go
around and getting psychiatrists and getting them all involved. It's how we
respond to our children. Sometimes it creates a problem.”
To me, it was apparent that Elders felt that she had just laid an egg, since
it was obvious that the book DOES promote pedophilia, and the stench
becoming unbearable, even for her, that her last words were, “no adult
should use a child in a sexual way.”
Yet, the entire book was about using a child in a sexual way. That
was the purpose of the book, which she was defending for the past
10 minutes -- a book so perverse that it would even make the prince
of darkness wince.
There you have it. The first question that comes to mind is -- who would
publish such garbage?
Who else but an institution of higher learning -- The State University of
Minnesota -- a taxpayer funded institution,
In it, the author Judith Levine also advocates lowering the age of sexual
consent to 12. A promotion for the book says, "children and teens can
enjoy the pleasures of the body and be safe, too.
How can any reputable person defend this book, even if you don't believe
in a higher authority? And to say that abstinence does not work is the
height of stupidity. If you don't have sex until you're married, it has GOT
You just know that someone is going to read this book and then go out and
sexually molest a child. This is inevitable. After all -- it was published
You may be asking, what does all this have to do with the killing of unborn
children, since that's what I usually write about.
Directly -- nothing, but I just had to share this with those who might have
missed the show, so they can be as angry as I, over this subversive,
repugnant and satanist inspired book which is spawned from the same cesspool that those who perverse God's laws drink from - whether they be an accomplice to the murder of the unborn or a sodomite or any other perversion that lust can stir up in the swill of hell's potion.
Nothing is sacred anymore. What can you expect from a society that kills
their own children in order that their lives would not be inconvenienced?
It all goes hand in hand -- an insidious progression of evil and the end does
not appear to be in sight.
It's about time people start realizing that there is evil in this world.
That there is a devil. Do you really think that someone could write such
a book without the prodding of satan?
Do you really think that people can accept the proposition that a woman
should have the right to kill her unborn child, if she so chooses, without
being seduced by satan?
92% of people say they believe in God, but for some reason satan
and the existence of pure unadulterated EVIL gets a free ride.
Jesus Christ was tempted by satan on more than one occasion.
The sooner people realize there is evil/satan in this world, the better
they can understand and develop ways to defeat him and send him
packing back to hell where he came from.
To sign an online petition to Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura demanding
he halt publication of the book visit:
You would think that a governor of any state would halt the publication of
this very sick book, without having to be begged. However, this
is the same Jesse Ventura who approved an entire month as, "Gay and
Lesbian Awareness Month," but won't allow a single “Day of Prayer.”
He must hear from as many of us as possible. Please sign the petition today.
Let's give this former WWF Adonis who went by the name of "Jesse the Body" something to really wrestle with!