I have a confession to make; I was once a thief. It all happened when I was
about 16 or so. A certain "friend" I had at the time (I will call him "KG,"
for those are his initials) invited me to yet another one of his crazy
capers, and this one (unlike so many others) seemed like one I could bring
myself to do as I had lost much face with him in recent months owing to my
refusal of so many of his other suggestions.
There was this house across the street from where I lived where no one was
living at the time. It had a "For Sale" sign in front and the previous
owners had already moved out. "So," KG suggested to me and a couple other
friends, "why not sneak inside that house where we can party and have fun
and not be seen?" Surely, if caught, and we were determined not to be, we
could not be accused of burglary since there was nothing inside there; the previous owners had already taken all their furniture and belongings with
them. And it wouldn't be "breaking" and entering since I knew how to get
into a house without doing any damage whatsoever. I had learned that skill
quite well, having been one of the "latchkey" kids, and since I lacked the
key itself, I even learned how to enter my own house without any key and
without doing any damage nor indeed leaving any trace of how I got in.
Surely I could apply the same skill here.
It all seemed harmless enough, so why not go along? So one fine afternoon,
we went up to the house. I began lifting the screen up out of its frame to
pull it out. As it took a little time, KG decided to "help" me a little bit
at trying to work it loose. But his "help" was rather clumsy and suddenly an
aluminum part of the screen broke in two. The screen then promptly came out
without any further damage, but damage was already done. Much as I felt like
backing out of the whole thing right then, KG made it clear what a waste it
would be to have accidentally done such a thing, and then not to use it by
proceeding. Anyway, the damage was already done and backing out now wouldn't
undo it, so I agreed to proceed with the entry knowing that if I had backed
out then everyone else (there were about 5 of us) would also have to back
out. Soon after, I had lifted the glass part of the window, slid it over and
removed it without any further damage and we entered.
Much of the next part was pretty much as I had expected. We told each other
all the rude jokes we couldn't tell at home, drank beer, horsed around and
in general had a grand old time of it, sort of like joyriding, but with a
stolen house instead of a stolen car. In the course of it all, KG and one
other began messing with the telephone. At that time telephones were built
in as part of the house, bought and sold with the rest of the house, and
exclusively maintained by the telephone company. But they had opened the
little plastic box where it connects to the wall and were messing with the
wires in some fashion that I neither knew nor understood. I vaguely recall
wishing they would just leave it alone but in all the other joking and what
not (also spilling some beer which I also was not happy about) I really had
not paid much attention to what they were doing with the telephone. After a
couple hours or so we left. I closed the window behind us and reinserted the
screen as best as I could in its damaged condition (but it still showed),
and thought that was to be the end of it.
That was not the end of course. The next day, KG was at my door with the
telephone saying that his mom said she was going to search his room, so to
hide it he brought it over to me for safekeeping. He said he would be back
for it after a couple days or so when the search was over. I hid it under
some bedding for the dog, a totally safe place where it should never have
been found. Yet, before KG could ever come back for it, it was found
somehow, and I confessed all to my parents. It was then that it was
explained to me that receiving stolen property is as much considered theft
as actually taking it, something that I, in my youthful naivete, had not been
aware of. I had no intention of taking it in the first place, was not aware
at the time when he did, and was only doing him a favor. I even intended to
try to find some way to persuade him to give it back somehow, whenever he
would come back for it. Yet despite all the best of intentions I received
the stolen telephone and in doing so therefore became a thief. The court
hearing was mercifully short; the judge merely reiterated what my parents
had already explained. Since that had been my only scrape with the law as a
minor, the court agreed to seal my record when I turned 18.
You may notice that I have titled this essay "Bad Company Ruins Good
Morals." Obviously, KG, and to a lesser extent the others I was also with at
the time, were bad company with whom I would have been wise not to
associate. I wonder how often people seem to think that bad company only
cause others near them to be bad by some vague sort of osmosis or something,
as if the bare presence of them in and of itself were enough to somehow make
good people inexplicably go bad. As if the spread of evil were a mere
accident, or something that if only I were just "stronger" in some sense it
might then somehow "just not happen." But of course all the "strength" in
the world, or out of it, would not have done a speck of good here. What good
it is to be able to lift twenty-ton chess pieces if you still don't know how
to move them so as to win the game? This essay is about what would have
worked, how such a fall could have been avoided.
Michael Aquino, one time compatriot of Anton LaVey and subsequent founder of
the Satanic Temple of Set in San Francisco once wrote, "There are no
Satanic missionaries." With whatever respect (if any) is due, I flatly
disagree. True, the conventional, open, above-board, cards-on-the-table,
frank and honest approach which is essential for God's missionaries is one
that is not open to Satan's missionaries, but one cannot construe that to
mean that Satan has no missionaries. It is just that they have to use a far
more subtle and sneaky approach.
Some people might even find it hard to believe that Satan has any
missionaries, even of the subtle and sneaky variety. After all, evil
requires good to depend upon. What use is it to rob a bank and get away with
a lot of money unless there exists a good, solid, stable, and orderly
society somewhere in which that money means something? Or again, what
parasite can live long if it kills its host? But like the tapeworm that
devotes much effort to propagating its own kind, evil has the same interest
in propagating itself. It wishes for associates from whom to build its own
little kingdom, sort of like Casa Nostra, the Mafia, or again such mobsters like Al Capone.
And who are Satan's missionaries? Those who really are bad company. It is
not enough for them to be troublemakers themselves; they want to make a
troublemaker out of you as well. In the short story "Satan Sends Flowers" by
Henry Kuttner, the character Fenwick, who is in the process of selling his soul to the
Devil, asks him why he wants it so bad. The Devil responds, "In your
fall, and in the fall of every soul, I forget my own for a moment."
Saint Peter (1 Peter 5:8) wrote that the Devil is like a lion, going about seeking
whom he may devour. So the Devil wants souls. How does he get them? What are
his exact strategies? That is what this essay is all about.
Some could wonder if in the following I am giving a course in the seducing of souls. Well, the bad guys already know these strategies; the rest of us are only to be forewarned against them. Furthermore, I do not claim that the titles by which I describe these strategies are how the bad guys call them, if indeed they have verbally articulated them at all. Rather, on a nonverbal level they see the example of their fellow bad guys and simply do the same.
The initial seducing strategies come in a triad of triads, but of course
there are further strategies beyond these. The first of the three triads are
the long term goals and efforts directed at general corruption of morals,
and these themselves are probably discussed in a good many sermons regarding
such things as the "choice of friends" and so forth. I will reiterate them
here because there are many who have not been privileged to hear such
sermons; these sermons are almost never given in these dark days. These
consist of
1) Suggestions,
2) Persistence, and
3) Loss of Respect for those
who will not play along.
The second triad, far more rarely mentioned (if
ever anywhere at all) consists of
1) the Tainted Invitation,
2) the False
Guarantee, and
3) the Accidental Overstep.
Finally, since evil is never
content with a single sin but seeks to build a pattern of sin, three
additional things are used to cement a soul's attachment to evil,
1) the
Sinful Compensation,
2) the Severance from Goodness, and
3) the Making of an
Addiction.
Beyond these there lies at least 1) the Test of Betrayal,
2) the
Burning of Bridges,
3) the Holding of Information about one,
4) Promotions
within the Echelon of Evil,
5) Building one's own Kingdom of Evil,
6) the
Enlistment of Innocent Others, and doubtless many more beyond even these.
7) Gradualism
I will review the story of my misadventure, applying these specific
strategies to understanding exactly what was really going on. I would beg
the reader to recall any similar occasion in their own life, where they hung
about with the wrong people and ended up in trouble, to please try to
remember all the details of how things had went for them and to see if the
same elements were operative on their getting into trouble as well.
The first line of the Satanic offense is the Suggestion. The one wanting to
ensnare another in evil is always making all sorts of crazy suggestions.
Sooner or later, it is only a matter of time before one is found which fits
the bill for the particular soul in question. How many ideas were floated
past me by KG which I immediately shot down, "No, somebody could get hurt,"
"No, it would be too easy to get caught," "No, we would need a
something-or-rather to do that one, and we don't have one of those," "No, I
really would not even see the point of doing that," and so forth. But in
time, some suggestion is bound to pass muster, which leads us to the second
element.
Persistence. Like looking for something which must exist but one knows not
where, if only one keeps on looking one will eventually find. Also, there is
nothing more powerful than sheer persistence. Continued long enough it will
wear anybody down, perhaps even to the point that even Suggestions already
given before and rejected might now be accepted. With Persistence, one
probes areas of weakness, places where the excuse for rejecting a suggestion
are unconvincing and might provide room for the response to be different if
only certain further conditions are met. So, for example, if breaking into a
house as an idea gets shot down because one would not want to even look like
a burglar, what about an empty house where there is nothing to steal? What
if we can get in and out without doing any damage or leaving any trace? What
harm could that possibly do? And if ever my patience begins to wear out and
I begin to think I don't want to hear anymore such Suggestions, this is
where the third strategy comes in.
Loss of Respect to those who will not play along. "You don't want to hang
around with me? What a baby!" and then everyone else sneers and snickers. "You're no fun!" they say as you find them all drifting away from you. No
matter how contemptible they are, you can't help but feel that you must be
even far more contemptible if even their respect is not gained. And often
these may include relatively innocent others whom you do respect. It is
often amazing the way the satanic missionary can so easily engage the
support of so many others, many of whom are those you go to school or work
with, are related to, live nearby, work for or have working for you, or
otherwise must interact with. Of the first nine categories I have listed
above, this is the only one most people have ever even heard of, coming
under the generic name of "peer pressure." But with all we know about peer
pressure and our focus to avoid its influence in our lives, let us not
neglect the other eight facets of the anatomy of the initial ruination of
morals, but also let us truly understand and appreciate the nefarious evil of peer
pressure.
The next triad would have to be called the detail strategies. These same
three steps get used over and over again, and the poor hapless soul led into
trouble by means of them never even sees what hit him, leaving him open to
be exploited by these means again. The first of these detailed strategies is
the Tainted Invitation. Using Persistence and continuous experimentation
with various Suggestions (and sustained by the Loss of Respect angle),
eventually the exact acceptable Tainted Invitation can then be prepared and
extended. And what is a Tainted Invitation? It is an invitation to do
something that you are convinced is really harmless and yet still entails
some sort of at least nominal infraction or risk of accidental but unwanted
consequences. Entering an empty house, but without doing any harm or damage
and without leaving any traces of our presence is nevertheless still against
the law, technically "Breaking and Entering," even were nothing actually
"broken" at all. The Tainted Invitation is therefore an invitation to do
something that seems like it should be perfectly OK, and (one would think)
would be perfectly OK if only the people who make the rules could be a
little less arbitrary and meaningless about it. "Yea, there might be some
stuffy old rule about this, but really since we mean and do no harm in it,
how can it really be any worse than using the wrong fork?"
And yet, with the Tainted Invitation our consent is thereby obtained. Funny
thing about giving consent is, having agreed to any part of the package you
actually get the whole thing and not just the palatable parts. This truly is
related to the fact that he who breaks one single law actually has broken
all laws. Yet somehow you really thought you could just settle for the
"harmless" parts. And how were you fooled in this? The second of the
detailed strategies, namely the False Guarantee. Even more than the Tainted
Invitation, the False Guarantee is the bread and butter of the Satanic
Missionary. By using the False Guarantee, he persuades you that the evil can
be totally contained and restricted to whatever small amount you have given
consent to. It is a False Guarantee not only in the practical sense that
things "somehow" just may not actually happen to work out that way, but
actually as part of the plan. The one making the False Guarantee not only
has no intention of bothering to make good on that guarantee; he actually
intends to violate it. I was promised that "no harm would be done and no
trace of our having been there would remain after we were gone." That was a
flat-out lie. The damaged window screen, the spilled beer, and the stolen
telephone were all part of the plan since before it was even broached to me.
Indeed, this planned violation of the False Guarantee is what comes under
the next heading.
The Accidental Overstep. "Oops! The metal part of the screen broke." "Oops!
The beer got spilled all over the carpet when the half-filled can was thrown
by one guy at the other guy." This of course is not really an accident, but
with great care and alacrity the poor hapless soul is led to believe that it
was. This is the most sensitive and delicate part of the whole process. It
has to be enough of a failure of the guarantee to register at all, but it
also must be kept sufficiently small so as to avoid scaring the victim into
waking up to what is going on and abandoning the whole process right then
and there. For the Satanic Missionary, this is the one point where the
rubber really meets the road. At all costs, the victim must be persuaded to
continue in the caper. Perhaps he may be assured that "This was only an
accident; nothing else will happen" (another False Guarantee). Also, the "In
for a penny, in for a pound" principle might be used, and finally it can
always be pointed out that backing out will not undo the damage anyway, so
why waste having done it by having it all be for nothing? Finally, a little
more peer pressure (Loss of Respect) can be applied at this point to seal
the deal.
One can see these detailed strategies being used again with the telephone.
"Oops, we 'accidentally' made off with the telephone." (another Accidental
Overstep) Then again, "Here, please hide it for me; you are just helping a
friend; you didn't take it." (Tainted Invitation, again) "Hide it well and I
will be back for it soon and the whole thing will be off your hands." (False
Guarantee). It would not surprise me to discover that KG was also the one
arranging for its discovery while in my keeping (Accidental Overstep -
again!). After all, Satan is "the Accuser" who, having led a soul into sin,
loves to boast about his accomplishment.
Leading a law-abiding kid into his first and only scrape with the Law is
obviously nowhere near enough to satiate the Devil. Without my complete
coming clean and repentance and further refusal to have anything to do with
KG, yet another three strategies would have been in store for me, indeed, to
some extent they were already attempted. The Sinful Compensation came here
in the modest form of the fact that once we were inside we did manage to
have a very fun time of it. If not for the Accidental Oversteps, which at
the time I honestly had no idea they had been deliberately committed, I
could have very much enjoyed the whole event. This is the first step in
binding a person to evil, when they can find something they enjoy in
committing a sin, and with time, about committing a sin. Such an evil choice
is further protected by the next step, the Severance from Goodness. This
step might consist of little more than a "preaching" of despair. On the one
hand KG would tell me how unfair it was that society was so hard on me for
simply having a good time and doing a friend a favor, as if they are
unreasonable, and on the other he would then talk as if it was all too late,
that there is now nothing I can do to return to their good graces, so I
might as well throw in with him and his like-minded cronies. Or I could be
maneuvered into actions that make it only all the more difficult for normal
society to accept me, thus providing some of this severance from the
opposite end. Of course, a far stronger bonding to evil would be
accomplished by getting the hapless soul to burn his bridges, but that must
generally be a much later step, and, as I did repent and utterly came clean, I
never arrived there.
The last of these steps is the Making of an Addiction. The easiest way to do
this is with drugs, hence the substantial illegal drug industry. But there
are other ways of achieving this goal, sometimes even in advance of doing
any of the other steps. An addiction is about making it so that there is
someone or something you absolutely have to have. With drugs it is the drug pusher, which
KG also was, and to this day he maintains one of the most "pro-druggie" websites I
have ever seen. This would have been his ticket to absolute control over me
had I continued with him. An addiction is a vice, a deeply grounded bad
habit, and impossible to break without extraordinary Grace and a heroic
struggle. And by allowing themselves to be put in such a position, they have
so distanced themselves from the very sources of Grace that the repentance
of any of them is truly a miracle.
And preventing such miracles, as much as possible, is where the later
strategies come in. In the Test of Betrayal, the one led into evil is "left
holding the bag," so to speak, for example after a robbery being the only
one caught. The Gang does not help him but leaves him to his own devices to
see if he will be loyal to the Gang, and usually "takes the rap" for some
particular crime. The Burning of Bridges merely finalized the break started
in the Severance from Goodness by some decisive act, and the Holding of
Information about one means that they come to know enough about you to ruin
you should it be found out.
Scientology makes tremendous distance from this, as they use their "E-meter"
to discover the most embarrassing things about a person, which are all then
kept on file and can find their way to public knowledge should the person
leave that group (which is why almost no one ever does). But criminal gangs
also know of all the crimes you committed with them and "got away with," at
least so far. The Promotion up the Echelon of Evil only occurs after one's
having proved their loyalty (perhaps more than once) in the Test of
Betrayal, as one moves up the ranks, from mere drug user to pusher to
high-stakes mega-dealer, and so forth, and this provides yet another Sinful
Compensation. One gets invested in building their own little Kingdom of
Evil, and further advances their position through using these skills,
together with others, such as that of the
Enlistment of Innocent Others
. With Gradualism, one starts the hapless soul off with tobacco, marijuana, or petty shoplifting, and only later moves them on to crack, heroin, or armed robbery.
From all of this, it is easy to see why troublemakers often remain so, even
though they know it is wrong and want to escape. And you can't even use a
"Kingdom of Evil" for any good (as some might enter such criminal groups
with such a goal) since the whole of your power merely comes from evil, and
will not allow good. Try to do something "good" with such power and you
will be eliminated long before any good comes of it.
As one can see, it all starts with those first nine steps, and I truly believe that if you look in your own life (almost no matter who you are who might be
reading this), you will see these very strategies being used by those who
would get you into trouble. Having recognized the strategies, one can now
know that all Tainted Invitations must be refused, False Guarantees never
trusted, and Accidental Oversteps, no matter how seemingly inconsequential,
cue to make a hasty exit as things have already long since gone too far,
though you didn't realize it.
In my case, given what a small town I lived in and that KG already had
everyone else in his pocket, at least as Enlisted Innocent Others, if not
outright members of his Kingdom, that meant having no friends, and indeed so
it was for the rest of my teenage years. But that was the price of having
no more scrapes with the Law and one I would gladly pay again if I had to do
it all over again.
It shouldn't be hard to see that the further one allows oneself to be taken
in by such bad company, the more difficult it becomes to disentangle
themselves, and also the more difficult it becomes to find in themselves the
extreme humility it takes to describe how they were taken advantage of.
Often we wonder about the mystery of iniquity, why it is that so many
villains can be so utterly loyal to Satan and evil, even when it would seem
that all compensation available to them would favor their repentance, but
in all these mere strategies, one can see the answer.