Just once before I die, I would like to hear ...
As the morals of our country keep slipping deeper and deeper into the
cesspool, the coming elections are of the utmost importance.
Soon we will be bombarded with the following TV ad from pro-abort
Democrats: “name... is against a woman's right to choose,” or “ name
... is against a woman's reproductive freedom.”
You would think that pro-life candidates would be sick and tired of these
euphemisms for death. You would think they'd be tired of being made
out to be the “fall guy.” You would think they'd be tired of being walked
on. Then again, maybe they like to keep scrubbing the footprints off their
face.
Just once before I die, when such a TV add appears -- PLEASE,
PLEASE, you supposedly pro-life candidates, start using your brains.
Don't you know when these ridiculous statements are made, you have
your condoners of death right where you want them? You have them in a
no win situation.
You should hope and pray that such ads are plastered over the airways,
because now you can expose them for the enablers of moral degeneracy that
they are.
Most people already know that our once godly country is going to hell in a
handbasket and this includes those, who accept the proposition that a
women should have the right to have her unborn child killed if she so
chooses. They know our country is morally sick and even they don't like it.
But since no one reminds them that their basic fears are not just pipe
dreams, they continue on their merry way.
Pro-life candidates are NEVER going to get the votes of the hard core
pro-aborts, but there are the great masses in the middle that can be won
over, if only pro-life candidates used common sense, instead of running for
the hills when such “choice” statements are uttered.
Here's how they MUST respond to the ads that condone killing:
“My opponent -- name -- says that I'm against a woman's right to choose.
Notice, he doesn’t have the “guts” to say the word abortion, because he
knows that it's the destruction of a human life. I can understand his
euphemism for death. It certainly sounds much better than, I will always
defend a woman's right to have her unborn child killed.
“As for me, I will always defend the rights of EVERYONE. This includes
the vulnerable -- even the littlest and most voiceless among us. I do
believe in the Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
It does NOT say ‘born equal.’ It says, all men are CREATED EQUAL --
a major difference. It is a scientific fact that the creation of human life
occurs at conception. We now have the ultimate proof -- DNA.
“No one has to be reminded that the morals of our country are in the
cesspool. Murder, assault, rape are commonplace. It is obvious that life
becomes cheaper with each passing year. We have only ourselves to blame,
as we have allowed the perception that life is cheap to permeate our society
The killing of 1.4 million human beings, under the guise of an abortion
propagates this perception -- how can it not?
Call me old fashion, but I still believe there is a God, Who will judge us
all
and His commandment, "Thou Shalt Not Kill", is etched in stone.”
Since most TV ads have to be short, that's it, but in a debate, the pro-life
candidate has the opportunity to expound. They could have a field day
with such a sadistic and satanist statement, if only they used their brains
and were not ashamed of their respect for human life.
They have everything going for them -- truth, science, but most of all, God
They could literally have the pro-choice [to kill unborn children] candidate
slumping and hiding behind the podium. They could have him/her rue the day
they uttered such an ungodly statement.
There's not a scientist in the entire world who could refute that human life
begins at conception.
In the majority opinion in the Roe Vs Wade decision that legalized the
killing
of unborn children right up to birth, it was stated that no one knows when
human life begins, etc., etc. Well, now we DO KNOW -- we have DNA
for the ultimate proof.
Pro-life candidates should not just say that they're pro-life and that
they're
against abortions. They should speak the truth and say that they are against
the KILLING OF UNBORN CHILDREN.
Why play into the hand of their pro-abort opponent and use the more
palatable word, “abortion.” Even the pro-aborts don't like to use it.
The killing is now, “choice.”
They have to explain “why” they're pro-life. People have to learn and
what better way than by pro-life politicians who are running for office?
They have the forum, the opportunity -- everything to gain and NOTHING to
lose.
The truth, will convince any person with just one fiber of decency left in
their entire body that to kill an unborn child is unconscionable and has
rocked the foundation of our country. Look around -- do you like what
you see?
Pro-life candidates should say that the killing of unborn children is
inhumane
and not conducive to a civilized society; that all human life is sacred and
just
because unborn children are still in the mother's womb, should NOT be
used as an EXCUSE to kill them, any more than killing a child after birth,
since both are still developing and cannot survive on their own. Size and
development should not play a part in who lives, or dies.
Oh, let's not forget the pro-aborts latest euphemism for death. They have
even softened it up a little more. Now, it's to “protect a woman's
reproductive freedom.” How about that LIE?
The pro-life candidate should say,
“I'm also for protecting a woman's
reproductive freedom, but, when a woman conceives -- when the male
sperm fertilizes the woman's ovum (egg), her reproductive freedom is
over -- done -- el fin -- the end. So, there's nothing to protect, unless
she was tied down and prevented from having sexual intercourse.”
But, as usual Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW and their army of
enablers and condoners, which includes the Hollywood filth industry and
all the rest of the pro-choice to kill crowd, continue to lie to the American
people.
Don't you know that abortions are safe? This lie has led to untold suffering
and thousands of deaths every year.
The pro-life candidate should also mention the following during his campaign.
“Now, we have overwhelming evidence that when a mother has her unborn child
killed, she INCREASES her risk of breast cancer. 13 of 15 studies done
in the United States and 28 of 37 World-Wide have shown this, but the
abortion mills do not inform women of this very serious risk.
"I am telling you, because I am concerned about women's health and the
skyrocketing cost of health care. Emotional problems, the abuse of alcohol
and drugs and suicide are MUCH higher in women, who have had their
child killed. I'm sure you can understand the reasons for this.
“Also, abortions increase the risk of premature births in subsequent
pregnancies,
that is if she was not made sterile by the abortion. This is due to the
damage
done to the cervix and lining of the uterus during an abortion. Thus, these
underweight babies ARE more prone to develop physical and mental problems,
including cerebral palsy.
“I have only mentioned the risks of abortion, which are being withheld
from the American people. Naturally, there are the immediate complications,
such as hemorrhage, punctured uterus, infection and even death.
"These risks, you will NOT hear from my opponent, nor will you hear
about them from the liberal media, because they want to protect the
multimillion dollar abortion industry so, the lives, not only of unborn
children,
but the health and lives of post-abortive women be damned.
Everything I told you is the TRUTH and if elected, I will continue to tell
you the truth."
Now, why can't I hear something like this from a pro-life candidate before
I die. Just once -- PLEASE.
They're NEVER going to get the vote of the hard core pro-aborts and since
they already have the pro-life vote in their hip pocket, why not go for the
vote
of those on the fence, and these voters have to be reminded that there is
a right and there is a wrong; that there is a God and there is satan.
They know, down deep in their hearts, that God would never be on the
side of the pro-choice [to kill unborn children] people. They just need
someone to remind them and someone who isn't afraid to invoke God's
name and someone who would sooner lose the election than sell his soul
to the devil for political gain.. Especially now, with the moral degeneracy
of our country at an all time low and obvious to all.
The time is ripe, if only pro-life candidates would not forget God and
His commandment, “Thou Shalt Not Kill.”
As a matter of fact, pro-life candidates should NOT wait until they are
attacked
for their pro-life position. Instead they should bring up the issue of the
killing
of unborn children FIRST and OFTEN.
They should attack and be on the offensive. They've got everything on their
side -- God, science, love and compassion. The pro-choicers have death,
suffering and satan on their side. And as I stated before, it is essential
that
they do NOT say the word “abortion.” They MUST say the TRUTH -- THE
KILLING OF UNBORN CHILDREN.
Did you ever, in your wildest dreams, ever think that this would be one of
our
basic freedoms? -- TO KILL. When our freedoms start to include killing,
then
that's where we have to draw the line.
A Pro-life candidate should convey to his opponent and the public that being
pro-choice [to kill unborn children], should not be a feather in one's cap,
but
instead, it just goes to show the extent that the morals of our country have
disintegrated and thus, instills in one's mind, the perception that life is
cheap.
We have perpetuated that perception, by allowing a woman to kill her unborn
child -- all because it would make her life easier. 42 million precious
children
have been killed in the past 29 years. 98% of all these killings are done
for
convenience sake. Is it any wonder that the perception that life is cheap
abounds in our country? So don't be shocked when children kill children
and teens/women have babies and throw them in dumpsters.
There are long lines waiting to adopt. All these killings are not necessary.
We are a better country than that. Not only would precious lives be saved,
but the untold suffering and death of women who are at the mercy of
abortion mills, because they will NOT warn them of risks and complications
from having their child killed -- would be negated.
If teens/women have no money, there are organizations to help. True,
[Un]Planned Parenthood would go broke. Now, wouldn't that be a shame?
But oh, how our country would be better off -- both physically and
spiritually.