A Primary Primer for Pro-Life Politicians
The formula for success for all those candidates who profess to be pro-life is to speak the truth. Don't cower from telling the people what abortion truly is: Killing Unborn Children!
Don't let pro-abort liberals push the agenda of women's rights without bringing up the inalienable rights of all as declared undeniably in our Declaration of Independence and upheld by our Creator as the most sacred of all.
The primaries for the 2002 elections are around the corner and the TV ads
have already started. “I will always defend a woman's right to choose.”
Interpretation: “I will always defend a woman's right to have her unborn
child
killed, if she so chooses.”
Pro-life candidates could have a field day with such a sadistic and satanist
statement, if only they used their brains and were not ashamed of their
respect
for human life and their love of God and His will.
They could literally have the pro-choice [to kill unborn children] candidate
slumping and hiding behind the podium. They could have him/her rue the day
they uttered such an ungodly statement.
To you pro-life candidates: You've got everything going for you. You have
the
truth, and science on your side, but most of all, you have God Who said, “Thou
Shalt Not Kill.” There's not a scientist in the entire world who could
refute
that human life begins at conception.
In the majority opinion in the Roe Vs Wade decision that legalized the
killing
of unborn children right up to birth, it was stated that no one knows when
human life begins, etc., etc. Well, now we DO KNOW -- we have DNA for the
ultimate proof. We also have ultrasound.
So, maybe I should stop here. The above says it all -- what more does one
need to know, to understand why the killing of unborn children is abominable
and a travesty of justice?
However, for those who are hell bent on the destruction of human life -- no
matter what, and will take their chances when they are ready to meet their
Maker, I will continue and who knows -- just maybe you will see the light of
God and not the light from the eternal fires of hell.
Abortion is too soft a word. Naturally, those who condone the killing of
unborn
children, the pro-choicers like it, but you don't have to play into their
hands
and use it. Besides it’s the wrong terminology.
To be correct, they should say induced or surgical abortions. Just plain
abortions also means spontaneous abortions. (miscarriages).
Pro-life candidates should not just say that they're pro-life and that
they're
against abortions. They should speak the truth and say that they are against
the KILLING OF UNBORN CHILDREN -- that it is inhumane and not conducive to
a civilized society, that all human life is sacred and just because unborn
children are still in the mother's womb, should NOT be used as an EXCUSE to
kill them, any more than killing a child after birth, since both are still
developing and cannot survive on their own.
When a pro-choice [to kill unborn children] person is running for a political
office, they plaster it all over the TV that they will defend a woman's right
“to
choose.”
Choose what? What to say, or to write? NO! The right to have their unborn
child killed. They don't even have the “guts” to say abortion, because of
what
it means.
Now, they have even softened it up a little more. Now, it's to “protect a
woman's reproductive freedom.” How about that LIE?
I'm also for protecting a woman's reproductive freedom, but, when a woman
conceives -- when the male sperm fertilizes the woman's ovum (egg), her
reproductive freedom is over -- done -- el fin -- the end.
So, there's nothing to protect. Unless she was tied down and prevented from
having sexual intercourse.
But, as usual the abortion mills and their biggest advocates, NARAL, NOW and
their army of enablers and condoners -- the pro-choicers, continue to lie to
the
American people.
In California, Governor Gray Davis is running for a second term. Already the
TV is ablaze with his ads. One of which, points out that one of his possible
opponents, (the primary is March 5) the former Los Angeles Mayor, Richard
Riordan, is pro-life and they cited the amount of money that he contributed
to
various pro-life organizations. In closing they said, “is this someone, who
you
can trust?”
I just could not believe that anyone would have the gall to run such an ad.
As if being pro-life makes someone distrustful and not capable of being
governor. It's such an outrageous ad that I don't think that satan, himself
would have the gall to run it. But, when you're dealing with liberal
Democrats
one must expect the worse.
What makes the ad all the more disgusting is the fact that Riordan is NOT
pro-life. It is a LIE. At one time he was, but switched for political
reasons. It's
what is known as selling one's soul to the devil for political gain.
Remember
Al Gore?
Davis knows this. Everyone in California with a modicum of political
intelligence knows it's a LIE. But still, as is the custom of pro-aborts,
they will
do anything and everything to get elected. What's a lie compared to killing
children while still in their mother's womb?
You cannot trust someone, who honors the word of God, essentially, is the
thrust of the Davis ad. I might add that Davis is a Catholic, who has
denounced his own Church, but more importantly, has mocked God.
This is a man you can trust?
Pro-life politicians running for office, should be proud that they're
pro-life. If
anyone should plaster it all over TV/radio and the newspapers, it should be
the
pro-life candidate. Don't hide it as many pro-life politicians do.
Don't be afraid to invoke God's name and don't be ashamed that you honor
God's will, “Thou Shalt Not Kill,” and uphold the sanctity of human life.
It’s not enough to just say that you’re pro-life. You have to explain,
“why,”
you're pro-life. People have to learn and what better way than by a pro-life
politician, who is running for office. They have the forum and they have the
opportunity.
The American people deserve the truth. How can they become pro-life when
they don't know the truth? The truth, will convince any person with just one
fiber of decency left in their entire body that to kill an unborn child is
unconscionable -- it is inhumane and has rocked the foundation of our country.
Look around -- do you like what you see?
Can there be any doubt, that the killing of 1.4 million unborn children
yearly,
gives people the perception that life is cheap -- it will be stored in the
brain,
and have a bearing on all future actions. So when children kill children and
teen age girls kill their newborn child, then don't be shocked.
For once, I would like to hear a pro-life candidate, in response to the
charge
that he is against a woman's “right to choose” the following: That is, if
they
want to win the election.
“My opponent says he will always defend a woman’s right to choose.
I don't know what that means -- choose what -- choose her religion --
choose what to say, or write? -- choose what? I think he means that
he will always defend a woman's right to kill her unborn child, but he
doesn’t have the ‘guts’ to say that, because he knows it's evil and
destroys a human life. Instead, he tries to make the killing of human
beings sound more palatable, so he sugar coats it by using the
euphemism, 'the right to choose,’ hoping that the true meaning will
somehow escape your cognizance.
“Now, he/she softens up the killing even more so, by saying 'a woman's
reproductive freedom' -- heck, I'm all for that too. But, once a woman is
with child, she has already taken advantage of her reproductive freedom
and should have no choice to kill another human being.
There's not a scientist in the entire world, who could refute that human
life begins at conception. Everytime a child is killed in their mother's
womb, God's Commandment, “Thou Shalt Not Kill,” is broken. Think
about that.
“I, on the other hand, will always speak the truth and give you no double-
talk. Yes, I do believe in God and I will not compromise my faith and
sell my soul to the devil just to get votes. If that's what you want, my
opponent is your man.
“Now, we have overwhelming evidence that when the mother kills her
unborn child, she INCREASES her risk of breast cancer. 13 of 15
studies done in the United States and 27 of 38 World-Wide have shown
this, but the abortion mills do not inform women of this very serious risk.
"I am telling you because I am concerned about women's health and the
skyrocketing cost of health care. Mental and emotional problems, drug
and alcohol abuse and suicide are MUCH higher in women, who have
had their child killed. I'm sure you can understand the reasons for this.
"All these risks and complications, you will NOT hear from my opponent,
nor will you hear about them from the liberal media, but they are the
TRUTH and if elected, I will continue to tell you the truth."
Now, why can't I hear something like this from a pro-life candidate? Wouldn't that be refreshing? They're
NEVER going to get the vote of the hard core pro-aborts. It's the voters on
the
fence, that you have to appeal to and these voters have to be reminded that
there is a right and there is a wrong; that there is a God and there is
satan.
They know, down deep in their hearts, that God would never be on the side of
the pro-choice [to kill unborn children] people. They just need someone to
remind them and someone who isn't afraid to invoke God's name and
someone who would sooner lose the election than turn his back on God.
Especially now, with the moral degeneracy of our country obvious to all and
the terrorist attack on 9-11, had the whole country turning to God. The time
is
ripe, if only pro-life candidates would not forget God and his commandment,
“Thou Shalt Not Kill.”
As a matter of fact, pro-life candidates should NOT wait until they are
attacked
for their pro-life position. Instead they should bring up the issue of the
killing
of unborn children FIRST and OFTEN.
They should attack and be on the offensive. They've got everything on their
side -- God, science, love and compassion. The pro-choicers have death,
suffering and satan on their side. And as I stated before, it is essential
that
they do NOT say the word “abortion.” They MUST say the TRUTH -- THE
KILLING OF UNBORN CHILDREN.
Did you ever, in your wildest dreams, ever think that this would be one of
our
basic freedoms? -- TO KILL. When our freedoms start to include killing,
then
that's where we have to draw the line. We're going deeper into the cesspool
every day.
If pro-life candidates have such little faith in God and are afraid to tell
the
truth, then they deserve to lose.
A Pro-life candidate should convey to his opponent and the public that being
pro-choice [to kill unborn children], should not be a feather in one's cap,
but
instead, it just goes to show the extent that the morals of our country have
disintegrated and thus, instills in one's mind, the perception that life is
cheap.
We have perpetuated that perception, by allowing a woman to kill her unborn
child -- all because it would make her life easier. 42 million precious
children
have been killed in the past 29 years. 98% of all these killings are done
for
convenience sake. Is it any wonder that the perception that life is cheap
abounds in our country?
One of the fundamental premises of our society is that we are all endowed by
our CREATOR; not by a woman's decision; not by court decisions, but by our
CREATOR with inalienable rights. The killing of unborn children destroys
that
premise, thus destroying everything that you believe in -- even the
Declaration
of Independence:
'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among
these
are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.'
Notice, that it does NOT say that all men are "born equal." It says, "all men
are
CREATED EQUAL."
Unborn children should not be discriminated against and condemned to death
just because they're growing and developing inside their mother's womb, any
more than they should be targeted for death after birth, since they are
continuing to grow and develop. The location of the development is
inconsequential, and should not be held against the unborn and used as an
excuse to kill them. The fact is, that in both cases, unborn and born
children
are still developing and cannot survive on their own.
What's next -- kill your baby after it's born, because it's still not fully
developed
and cannot care for itself?
Most people's knowledge of the killing of unborn children is woefully limited
--
they only know the lies, that are perpetuated by the pro-aborts. You know --
it's just a lump of tissue.
When people are given all the facts, then they will see the truth. Most
pro-choicers say they believe in God. If they REALLY do, then, there is no
choice.
The following excuse needs to be corrected: MOST PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW. Though many in the clergy of all faiths have badly fumbled the ball on this, the Pro-life politicians have the opportunity to
educate the populace to the moral, physical and psychological repercussions. If people don't know the truth, then how do you expect
them to see the evil in the killing of unborn children and why should
they
vote for pro-life candidates?
- Most people don't know that when most of the killings are done, the child's
heart has already started to beat; that there are brain waves; that their
little
bodies, hands, fingers, feet and toes have formed.
- Most people don't know that 42 million unborn children have been killed since
Roe Vs Wade, 29 years ago -- 1.4 million per year and that 98% of all
abortions
are done for convenience sake.
-
Most people don't know that the abortion mills tell women that what is
aborted, is just a lump of tissue and they don't let them look at the
ultrasound,
which would show human life, for fear that women would change their minds.
-
Most people don't know that there has been a sharp rise in child abuse, since
the Roe Vs Wade decision. To kill your unborn child, naturally would make
one more hardened and callous.
-
Most people don't know that women who have their unborn child killed, have
a much higher rate of breast cancer. For details see hometown.aol.com/dfjoseph/abortioncancer.html.
-
Most people don't know that abortions increase the rate of premature babies in
subsequent pregnancies, these preterm babies will be of low birth weight and
more prone to physical and mental disorders, including cerebral palsy. For
details see hometown.aol.com/dfjoseph/abortionvschildbirth.html.
-
Most people don't know that over 90% of women having abortions suffer
damage to their self-esteem. Nearly 50% of post-abortion women begin or
increase drug and alcohol abuse. In the years to follow, 60% experience
suicidal tendencies, with up to 28% actually attempting suicide.
-
Most people don't know that Human life was NOT created at birth. We were
created by God, in his own image at conception -- when the sperm fertilizes
the ovum. This union causes a double set of chromosomes, (half from the
sperm and half from the ovum), which contain the genes/DNA which determine
particular characteristics in the human being. This is irrefutable.
There's NOT
a scientist in the entire world, who would have the audacity to deny this.
-
Most people don't know that to kill a developing baby in the womb, is the
same as killing a baby after it's born. Both are human beings, created by
God
in his own image at conception and not at birth.
Life is a continuum: zygote, embryo, fetus, newborn, infant, child,
adolescent
and adult. The unborn grows and develops inside the womb and the newborn
continues to grow develop outside of the womb. In both instances they
cannot and survive on their own. To kill either one is a very grievous sin
-
Most people don't know that prior to Roe Vs Wade, the pro-aborts said that
thousands of women die every year from back alley coat hanger abortions, so
they have got to be made legal.
-
Most people don't know that this concern by the pro-choice [to kill unborn
children] crowd for the lives of women having illegal abortions was bogus.
Their battle cry and main argument that abortions should be made legal, was
a lie and they got away with it.
-
Most people don't know there were NOT thousands of deaths prior to Roe Vs
Wade. In 1972, the year before Roe Vs Wade only 39 abortion related deaths
were reported by emergency rooms and morgues, to the Centers for Disease
Control. Currently more women die yearly from complications of abortions
than before Roe Vs Wade.
-
Most people don't know that it's not a private issue concerning a woman's
decision. It's like slavery -- when human beings were not considered
persons
and had no rights and were subject to the will of their owners.
It's the most important issue of public principle that America faces today.
Are
we to be a nation under GOD with compassion, love and decency, or a
barbaric nation of degeneracy, which embraces the ideology that one of our
basic freedoms should be TO KILL, if we so choose?
-
Most people don't know that respect for life is a principle and when you give
women the power to decide if a helpless baby in their womb is going to die,
then don't be so surprised when they think that a baby is subject to their
will,
and kill it 5 seconds after it's born and throw it in a dumpster, or 5 years
after
it's born. The principle of violence is the same.
-
Most people don't know that the killing of 1.4 million unborn babies yearly,
becomes a major factor in the public's perception that life is cheap. That
perception will be stored in the brain, where it will be retrieved to
determine
all future actions and reactions.
Now, we have to suffer the consequences of that perception. Do you like what
you hear or read when you turn on the news, or read the newspapers these
days?
So don't be surprised if a person's disrespect for the sanctity of life rubs
off on
their children, and don't be surprised when children kill children, and when
teens throw their newborn child in a dumpster.
-
Most people don't know that to make a statement such as, “I believe that
abortions are wrong, but that a woman should be given that choice and if it's
a
sin, then it's her sin,” goes against everything that's in the Holy Bible.
We will all be judged not only by our own actions, but also by how we
influence others. (to do good and abide by God's laws, or to sin).
We are told by Jesus Christ and the Holy Scriptures to help the sinner find
his
way to God and to sin no more. So if we sit idly by and do not try to stop
the
slaughter of unborn children, which is a sin, then we will have to answer to
GOD.
So when you say that a woman should have the right to kill her unborn child,
then, in reality, you are condoning and sanctioning the taking of a human
life
-- a grievous sin.
This support and encouragement acts as an authoritative permission which
influences women to kill their unborn children.
Thus, the pro-choicers are a party to these mass killings and a great delight
to
satan. I wonder how they would explain their condoning of the killing of
unborn children to God -- their Creator?
To be pro-choice is to condone a sin of immense magnitude -- the destruction
of a human life. To condone sin, is to propagate evil.
It boggles my mind that the pro-choice [to kill unborn children] people are
unaware of their proximity to hell.
Dr. Frank Joseph
For past columns by Dr. Frank, see PRO-LIFE PRESCRIPTIONS Archives
|
|
Wednesday, February 20, 2002
volume 13, no. 33
Dr. Frank Joseph's PRO LIFE PRESCRIPTIONS column
www.DailyCatholic.org
|
|
|