Does anyone care that abortions increase the risk of breast cancer? Does
anyone care that thousands of women die needlessly every year, because
they are not warned by abortion mills prior to having their baby killed?
Does anyone care that the Media is silent on this VERY newsworthy story?
Does anyone care that the ACS (American Cancer Society) is sitting on
its hands with this life saving news?
The evidence is overwhelming. 13 of 14 studies done in the United States
and 27 of 34 worldwide have shown the risk.
How many times have you heard that cell phones “MAY” increase the risk of
getting brain tumors/cancer. The media is constantly warning us of this
I heard it again on TV yesterday. Dr. George Carlo, who was the former
chief scientist for the Cell phone Industry was one of two persons being
interviewed. He wrote a book entitled: “Cell Phones -- invisible hazards
in the wireless age.”
He said and I quote, “5 out of 7 studies done on cell phones, showed an
increase risk of brain tumors. This against a backdrop of our expectations,
when you wouldn't expect to see anything like this in 15 -20 years. The
fact that we have 5 studies that show an increased risk of brain tumors is
Dr. Carlo then went on to say, “Lab studies clearly shows that radiation
from cell phone antennas causes genetic damage to human blood.
John Boice, who was on the same show said there was NO risk and cited
a study that was done in Denmark, which said the link was inconclusive.
Remember that name -- “DENMARK.”
The Media -- TV and newspapers are all over this story -- constantly.
Can you blame the them? They are concerned and want people to
know that 5 of 7 studies have shown the link. They are concerned about
peoples’ welfare. Very commendable, indeed.
HOWEVER, these same people don’t give a darn that 13 of 14 studies
done in the United States and 27 of 34 worldwide have shown the increased
risk of breast cancer from abortions.
Yet they are constantly warning of the risk of cell phones on just FIVE
I think it’s fine that the Media warns people of the cell phone risk of brain
cancer. But why don’t they warn women about the abortion/breast
cancer risk? How many studies do they need, that show the risk, when
it comes to abortions -- 40, 50, 100. Just how many?
They jumped at just five studies, when a cancer risk had NOTHING to
do with abortions. Ah, there’s the rub -- ABORTIONS.
In Jefferson City, Mo, a bill was heard this past Wednesday that would require
physicians performing abortions to tell patients "of the increased risk of
breast cancer associated with the proposed abortion." The notice must
come 24 hours before the procedure.
Kerri McBee-Black of Planned Parenthood of Kansas City testified that
the waiting period "places an undue burden" on Missouri women.
Since an abortion is an elective surgery, I’m still trying to figure out,
what that undue burden could possibly be on Missouri women? Could
it be that there’s something about Missouri women that I don’t know?
Remember that word -- DENMARK? At the hearing, it was cited that
a study done in Denmark in 1997, showed that cell phones did not put
users at a risk for brain tumors/cancers.
When studies first came out that smokers were placed at a higher risk
for lung cancer, that too was debunked. Why do thousands of people
have to die, before we finally put politics aside and use just plain
What is this love affair that Democrats, (90% are pro-aborts), have
with Denmark? The United States has the best scientists in the world
and 13 of 14 studies done in our country have shown the abortion/breast
cancer risk. They had to look high and wide to find a study that they
liked and sure enough, they found it in little Denmark, in whose study
claimed that the abortion/breast cancer link was inconclusive. I have
to say that the Denmark study was full of flaws and was shredded to
pieces by Dr. Joel Brind, the world’s most knowledgeable person on
this subject. Click on Dr. Brind for details.
Lo and behold, the cell phone Industry ALSO found what they wanted
to hear in Denmark. How is that for a coincidence? Surely, this has
got to tell you something. It reminds you of “hired gun” professionals,
who testify in trials. They will say whatever you want to hear -- if the
money is right.
To warn women of an increased risk of breast cancer should be
WELCOMED. If they are going to make the most important decision
of their lives, shouldn’t they have all the facts? Where was NOW
(National Organization of Women)? Aren’t they in the business of
looking out for the welfare of women, or are they just a political
All of this is just more proof that our country has earned the title
of, "the culture of death.” In addition to killing 1.4 million unborn babies
every year -- 5,000 a year while they are being born and suffer
excruciating pain -- now we don’t care if women get breast cancer
and die. A very serious accusation -- but TRUE.
There are people in our society who will bend over backward to hide
the truth. All to protect the multimillion dollar abortion industry. They
go by the names of liberal Democrats and naturally are backed by
Planned Parenthood, NARAL and NOW.
The other risks, though not nearly as great as the abortion risk, are
exposed because they are not political. This is so sad -- 5000 women
will continue to die every year from breast cancer, when it could have
easily been avoided. But, such is the state of our nation -- politics
It's obvious why the lucrative abortion industry will not warn women of
this deadly risk prior to an abortion, but why the silence by the ACS
and the Media? That is the question.
Why should the truth be hidden? Let women decide, after they have
all the facts, so they can make the proper choice. Or does the word
“choice,” which the pro-aborts love, only matter when one wants to
have their child killed?
Why don’t YOU, the readers of this article be the judge, if you are
not satisfied that 27 studies worldwide have shown the risk. You
don’t have to be a medical doctor, or a scientist to understand the
mechanism behind the risk. It’s not that complicated.
It is estrogen, which is produced in the ovaries, which SURGES, when
a pregnancy occurs. This hormone causes the breast cells to proliferate
dramatically in the first trimester, in order to lay the foundation for the
production of milk. In the second half of pregnancy, the estrogen
levels RECEDE under the influence of such hormones as human
placental lactogen. The immature cells then grow and differentiate
rapidly into mature, specialized milk producing tissue. Once
specialization has occurred, the cells are less likely to turn cancerous,
because this IS the normal physiology of a woman’s body during a
pregnancy. This is what our Creator intended.
However, if a woman has an induced abortion, this protection is
terminated. The reason is because the proliferation of the
undifferentiated, cancer-vulnerable cells, by the estrogen secreted
early in the pregnancy, no longer has the protection that comes from
hormones released later in pregnancy, including placental lactogen,
because there is NO longer a placenta, because it was removed when
the baby was dismembered and removed.
When the pregnancy is terminated by an induced abortion, these
young growing cells (known as undifferentiated cells), and having
undergone drastic changes are now in LIMBO. They are no longer
normal breast cells, nor are they capable of producing milk and are
MORE prone to develop cancer.
In plain English, these insulted cells (traumatized) have been hung
out to dry. They are between a rock and a hard place. Scientists
have known for years that any cell in the human body that has been
traumatized, whether by chemicals, radiation, micro-trauma, or any
other reason would be especially vulnerable to cancer.
One must then surmise that what has been instilled in physicians
and scientists heads from time immemorial, regarding the vulnerability
of abnormal cells, is no longer valid. To suit their political agenda,
they would have you believe that an abnormal cell is NO more prone
to becoming cancerous than a normal cell. This defies all scientific
knowledge, as well as common sense and shows the depths they
will go, to keep the abortion industry flourishing. Human life means
nothing to them, whether it be the killing of unborn babies, or women
who may die from cancer after they have their unborn babies killed.
The estrogen/breast cancer risk has been known by doctors for
many years, thus their reluctance to prescribe estrogen for
menopausal women, especially those with any family history of
Manufacturers of oral contraceptives alert the public as to the possible
link between their product and breast cancer.
The induced abortion risk is greater than the relative risk associated
with oral contraceptives.
According to a report in the American Journal of Pathology, August
1980, pp 497-511, cancer researchers injected a number of pregnant
rats with DMBA, a cancer-causing substance. They then aborted half
the rats; the other half were allowed to carry their pregnancies to term.
Among the aborted rats, 77% developed breast cancer. Among the
term rats, only 5.5% developed breast cancer.
There you have it. What do you think? Should women be warned
prior to an abortion?
Is it as important as the Media warning people about cell phones,
on only FIVE studies? Now, you know more about this subject than
most doctors. I even asked two oncologists (doctors who specialize
in tumors and cancers) about the ABC link and both said, they
had never heard about any studies. How could they -- the AMA, the
ACS and the MEDIA - keep it -- “America’s best kept secret'?
For more details on this subject, click on Abortions-Breast Cancer,
on my web site. hometown.aol.com/dfjoseph/abortion.html.