Why is the United States covering up for the abortion industry? Aren't
women in the most powerful country on Earth entitled to know the truth?
Are their lives worth less than the lives of British women?
A December 4, 2001 report out of London England stated that British
scientists said that women who have had an abortion are up to twice as
likely to suffer from breast cancer.
In the first study of its kind in Britain, researchers said the risk of
cancer is significantly increased if a woman has undergone an abortion.
The study, which looked at breast cancer and abortion rates in Britain,
Finland, Sweden and the Czech Republic, draws a direct link between
rising cases of breast cancer and an increase in abortion since it was
The research, by the Populations and Pensions Research Institution, an
independent group of statisticians, suggests that up to 50 percent of breast
cancer cases in England and Wales over the next 26 years will be
"attributable to abortion."
Professor Joel Brind of New York's City University and director of the
Breast Cancer Prevention Institute in New York, pointed out it was
He said: "Women are at risk and they do not really know about it. They
certainly don't seem to be finding out about it from the NHS."
"This implicates a risk factor that is a matter of choice," Brind explained.
"Simply undergoing [an abortion] once measurably increases the
risk of breast cancer. We are talking about thousands of cases of breast
cancer over the next twenty years. This is a very sobering statistic."
Researcher and author Patrick Carroll said the total number of breast
cancer cases is expected to more than double in England from 35,110 in
1997 to 77,000 in 2023. The rise was largely because of abortions carried
out on women who have not yet had a baby, Carroll said.
"Breast cancer incidence has risen ... in parallel with rising abortion
There is no doubt there is a causal relationship," he said.
"Perhaps as many as 50 percent of these cases will be attributable to
abortion and unless there is a major improvement in treatment, the number
of women who die from the disease will rise alarmingly."
Professor Brind said a surge in levels of the hormone estrogen in the
first three months of pregnancy by around 2000 percent is the most likely
mechanism for increasing risk in women who subsequently undergo an
One would think that this news would make the headlines of all newspapers
in the USA and be the subject of ALL television news. But, you won't
hear a peep from them.
I guarantee you that they have NO news as newsworthy as this. Anything
negative that has to do with abortions is off limits.
It's obvious why the billion dollar abortion industry will NOT warn women
of this serious risk, but the media has NO excuse. The fact that
thousands of women WILL die every year in the United States means
nothing to them.
The media will expose all other cancer risks at the drop of a hat, as long as
they have nothing to do with abortions. Products have been pulled from
with MUCH less evidence.
Cell phones -- how often have you heard -- they MIGHT cause brain cancer?
This, on just a few studies, only to be denounced by a couple of other
The media didn't care that the pros and cons were about equal. It was NEWS
and abortions were NOT implicated.
There have been 15 studies done on the abortion/breast cancer risk in the
States alone and 13 have shown an INCREASED risk. 28 of 37 studies worldwide
have also shown the increased risk. This is landslide evidence, unlike the
cell phones -- still the media sits on its hands.
Why is this, America's best kept secret -- that is the question?
We know that the media is 80% liberal Democrat and certainly one would
have to have a liberal mind to think that women should have the right to have
their unborn child killed, if it would make their lives easier.
Since, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise, the abortion issue is NO. 1
on the Democratic ledger. The Democratic controlled Senate headed by
majority leader, Tom Daschle and fellow Democrat Pat Leahy, the
chairman of the judiciary committee, have yet to approve of any of President
George W. Bush’s many appointments to the bench. The shortages on our federal
benches are way past the critical level.
They are so afraid that Bush’s appointees are pro-life and that he will
pro-life justices to the Supreme Court that they are literally in a constant
The fact that these appointees may know the Constitution inside and out,
makes no difference. Unless you are of the same ideology as pro-aborts, you
will not be confirmed.
Daschle and Leahy are both so-called Catholics, which is all the more mind boggling.
They have sold out their own faith and their souls to satan for political
Then again, so have 10 other Catholic Democratic Senators, who also
condone the killing of unborn babies.
Maybe one of the tabloids will have a headline -- CATHOLICS FOR
ABORTIONS -- BISHOPS SILENT.
Maybe this will wake up the bishops to give more than a token lip service
to the killing of 4,000 children of God EVERY day in the USA.
I have another thought as to why the silence by the media on the ABC Link.
I believe that many in the media, if not most of them, have either had an
if female, or their wives or girlfriends, or daughters have had one, or more.
Since Roe Vs Wade in 1973, about 41 million unborn children have been
killed -- 98% for convenience sake. So, one can readily understand the
law of averages.
The overwhelming evidence that abortions increase the risk of breast cancer,
is not good news for the media. Their mindset is simple -- we were not
warned -- our fate is sealed. It would only harm the abortion industry.
If I, or my loved ones have taken the chance, on an early death, then others
should too. Yes, it is a selfish world we live in. Misery loves company.
Also, if per chance there is a God, who said, “Thou Shalt Not Kill,” they
want to make sure that they have plenty of company when they arrive at
the “pearly gates.” They will gamble that God will not send half the
population to hell. Good luck.
The following you will not believe, it illustrates this very point:
Last week The Daily Illini, the campus newspaper for the University of
Illinois, ran a story called, “Politicians call for stricter abortion laws,”
Daily Illini article .
The author, Mary Tallon, reported that a total of 47,250 abortions had been
performed in Illinois last year. This represents an increase of 1,236 over
the previous year. This is partially due to the fact that Illinois does
not have a parental consent law, whereas neighboring states do. Twelve
percent of the abortions performed in Illinois last year were done on women
coming from neighboring states.
State Senator Patrick O’Malley, a gubernatorial candidate, offered his
comments in a press release and argued that the increased number of
abortions are also the result of a lack of informed consent legislation in
this state. In particular, women are not being informed about the
abortion-breast cancer risk. Senator O’Malley sponsored Senate Resolution
8, which called for a task force to investigate the research linking abortion
with this disease. The measure, however, fell short of passage by only
three votes in the Illinois Senate last spring.
“Pro-choice” women in the Senate, including Christine Radogno and
Kathleen Parker, fought bitterly against this resolution. Lt. Governor
Corinne Wood, a breast cancer spokesperson and gubernatorial hopeful,
testified against it, and argued that women who had abortions would
experience added “guilt.”
Gee, ADDED guilt, I thought there would be no guilt after a woman had
their unborn child killed.
That's what Planned Parenthood keeps shoving down our throats. They
say that post abortion stress is just a figment of pro-lifers’ imagination.
we have a pro-choicer, in essence, calling, Planned Parenthood, LIARS.
Shouldn't they get their act together?
After all, we wouldn't want women to have added guilt, by informing them
that abortions increase the risk of breast cancer. Apparently Ms. Wood
doesn’t want to spare other women her suffering and that even death is
preferable than to harm the abortion industry.
This is a very strange argument coming from a cancer survivor. No one
(not even tobacco executives) made this argument when the tobacco-
cancer link was discovered.
The first tobacco study was published in 1928, but it was 1966 before
Congress required warnings on cigarette packages. Must we repeat
the same mistake? Abortion has been aggressively marketed, like
tobacco. The industry's politicians, paid experts and supporters have
struggled, like tobacco executives, to suppress the truth for almost a
All that was asked for -- was a task force to investigate the research
abortion with breast cancer. It said nothing about ending abortions because
they were a health hazard -- ONLY, to investigate the research. Certainly
in a civilized society this is a not only a proper request, but one that
should be demanded. Even so, the measure fell short of passage by
only three votes. The losers -- WOMEN.
If women have all the facts, including risks and all complications of an
abortion, the abortion industry will suffer a “big” loss. What sane woman
would take that kind of chance. Planned Parenthood, the most prolific
of unborn children in the world, NARAL, NOW and all their advocates,
including those who claim to be “pro-choice to kill,” are trying to block
this life-saving news from the American public.
They have to resort to lies, the biggest of which is -- the evidence is
If they have really read all the studies linking abortions to breast cancer,
CANNOT make that statement. The evidence is overwhelming.
Do you need more proof that we live in a selfish -- what's in it for me
That satan is running amok; that the “pro-choice to kill” liberals, want
abortion industry to keep flourishing in spite of the deaths of thousands of
women every year, solely from the fact that they HAD AN ABORTION.