THURSDAY
July 6, 2000
volume 11, no. 117

INTRODUCTION


Dr. Frank Joseph's Pro-Life Prescriptions LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL column for July 6, 2000
2000 Supreme Court Wins Absurdity Title

    The 2000 United States Supreme Court was declared the winner in "Jurisprudence Absurdity." The holder of the ďtitleĒ for the past 143 years was the Supreme court of 1857 with their infamous Dred Scott decision, in which they declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, because a slave could not be taken away from his master. Slaves were not considered whole people and had no rights.

    The current Supreme Court won the title on June 28, with a display of bobbing, weaving and fancy mouth and footwork that our country has not seen in a long time. Their liberal logic was faulty and politically based and any relation to interpreting our Constitution was purely coincidental.

    It was the Stenberg Vs Carhart decision, in which they declared, that the Nebraska law that outlawed the killing of a baby when he/she was 3/4 born was unconstitutional. As slaves were, these babies were also not considered whole people and had no rights.

    No one can deny that this was a red-letter day for satan and a day that must have brought great sadness to the face of God.

    The justices, by a 5 to 4 vote, found that the Nebraska law making it a crime to perform "partial birth abortions" was unconstitutional because it imposes an "undue burden on women's decisions to end their pregnancies."

    Somehow the "Faulty Five" extrapolated from our Constitution that a state could pass NO law that would prevent an evil act. Please someone, point this out in the Constitution.

    An undue burden -- how about that!?! I really know what an undue burden is. Itís so easy to toss words around. Does that mean that a women wanted to keep her baby, which is why she didn't have her baby killed in the first 14 weeks, but then something came up and now her baby was in the way and she wants him/her dead? How about the undue burden that it puts on the babies, as they are stabbed in the head and their brains are sucked out, with many of them suffering excruciating pain?!

    A baby, who if they would just let be born, might live and raise a family and have a fulfilled life, as did their executioners, which includes not only the one who wields the knife, but the justices who gave their permission.

    Their ruling, which must be causing our founding fathers to be turning over in their graves, was a slap in the face to 75% of Americans, who find partial-birth abortion disgusting. 57% of Americans favor making most abortions illegal. However the Supreme Court persists in allowing any abortion, any time and for any reason.

    Albert Gore, the man, who wants to be president was thrilled at this decision, as was the Democratic party as a whole, which if the truth be told, has become satanís pride and joy.

    This gruesome procedure, where the fetus is partially removed from the vagina and the skull collapsed, is known as an intact dilatation and extraction, or D&X. It is performed in mid to late second trimester and the third trimester. First the cervix is dilated over a two day period. Then the abortionist inserts forceps into the uterus, grabs the baby by its feet and pulls the entire baby out of the uterus into the vaginal cavity. The head is too large to come through the cervix, so while the baby is stuck in this position and dangling and kicking his little legs outside of the woman's body, the executioner stabs the back of the baby's head with a pair of scissors, making a hole to insert a catheter and as these precious creations of God are flailing away, fighting for their lives, they suddenly stiffen as their brains are sucked out with a powerful machine, then they go limp. With the head collapsed, the babies are then delivered -- dead. Thus the abortionist escapes being a murderer, because the baby was killed before the head was delivered.

    As the pioneer of the technique, Dr. Marvin Haskell, notes that a doctor sometimes over-dilates the cervix and has to hold the baby's head inside the vagina: or the baby could just fall out. What Dr. Haskell means is that it would be murder if the baby is killed if his/her head is also out of the vaginal canal, so they will deliberately hold the head in the vaginal canal when they kill the baby.

    Nurses at these abortion mills, tell stories of becoming sick and had to quit, after seeing whole babies delivered alive, only to be killed by drowning, or some other method. They watched in horror, as the babies flailed their little arms and legs and fought for their lives.

    Partial-Birth Abortions are done for two reasons only:

  • 1 - In case a woman changes her mind late in her pregnancy -- she can still have her baby killed -- "legally." This is tragic and it is sick.
  • 2 - When the entire baby is delivered intact, (including the head) it is more profitable to the abortionist and the abortion mills. The brain sells for $900.00 -- the baby's organs and limbs are also intact and sold to the highest bidder for experiments.

        The five Supreme Court justices, who saw nothing wrong with this, are Breyer, who delivered the opinion of the Court, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter and Ginsburg, thus joining all abortionist and Hitler, in their disrespect for human lives.

        A sad day indeed for our country. Over 2/3 of the House of Representatives wanted this procedure banned and almost 2/3 of the Senate, with the Republicans overwhelmingly voting for its demise and the Democrats overwhelmingly voting to continue this brutal act.

        Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy, filed dissenting opinions.

        The American Medical Association says this procedure is never needed to save the woman's life, nor to ensure her health.

        Just to show you the absurdity of all this -- if a doctor performed this procedure when a woman's health or life were in jeopardy and she died, that doctor would be sued for malpractice, because itís not an emergency procedure, because the cervix has to be first dilated over a two day period. Now, who can wait two days, if an emergency arises.

        This same court would then uphold the conviction of the doctor. They would have no other choice. The Nebraska law was challenged by Dr. LeRoy Carhart, one of the state's three abortion providers and the only one who performed the controversial procedure. Dr. Carhart said that if this procedure is outlawed, then 98% of all abortions cannot be done. Also, Planned Parenthood, the leading killers of unborn babies have been clamoring for months that if this procedure is outlawed, then all other abortion procedures would be too. They said, that will be the end of Roe Vs Wade.

        Another lie told by the masters of deceit, but apparently the majority of the court took it to heart, but there was no need to. Their killing of human beings was never in danger. Have they not shoved it down everyone's throats that 90% of all abortions are done in the first trimester? This gruesome procedure is done the latter half of the second trimester and the third trimester, because the baby has developed to the point where his/her bones, are too hard to be torn apart inside the uterus.

        I must tell you that as a physician, this procedure makes me sick just thinking about it. How could a doctor, who has sworn to save lives, do such an evil act? How could a country condone it? I do believe that the doctors who perform this repugnant act are akin to Hitlerís evil doctors and the slaughter of 6 million Jews, with many used for experiments -- dead or alive. They are all evil and of the same mindset.

        I also believe that all so called pro-choicers are akin to the German people, who knew what was happening to the Jews and did nothing.

        For to be pro-choice is to condone. To condone is to sanction. So, when you say, a woman should have the choice to kill her unborn baby, then in reality, you are sanctioning the taking of a human life -- a sin. This support and encouragement acts as an authoritative permission, which influences women to kill their unborn babies. Thus, pro-choicers are a party to these mass killings and a great delight to satan. And I hope they don't think they're pulling a fast one on God.

        In 1871, The American Medical Association called all abortions, "foul, unprovoked murders." Our feminist foremothers, Susan B. Anthony, Stanton, Brinkerhoff, Gage, Goldman, Norton, and Paul, all vehemently opposed abortions. Abortion was referred to as "child murder." This reflects how the morality of our country has degenerated since that time. How far do we have to go into the cesspool, before we start gagging?

        God gave us a free will, but little by little, our once Godly country has now been taken over by satan; for to torture and kill a baby in this manner is surely NOT condoned by God fearing people. Only by those, who do NOT believe in God, or who are not sure if there is a God.

        The main objections cited by the majority were twofold:

  • 1 - If PBA were outlawed, most other abortions would be too. Sounds as if it came right from the script of Planned Parenthood. This is pure garbage, because if they, or the killer of the baby, can't tell the difference between a baby, who is 3/4 delivered and a baby who is still inside the uterus, then they should not be sitting on the Supreme Court and the abortionist should have his license taken from him.
  • 2 - That there should be a health clause in the ban. This is the reason Clinton gave for vetoing the ban. So if the woman says that the pregnancy gives her a headache, or makes her nervous, that's all that's needed, because the person who weighs the facts, is none other than the person who will profit from killing her baby -- the abortionist.

        So, anyone with the IQ of a turnip, would have to come to the conclusion that a health clause would be completely useless. Mind you, there was a clause that it could be done to save her life, (although it's not needed) but this wasn't good enough.

        They wanted a useless clause that a first year medical student could get around. Well, maybe I should not have said that. I should have said a ten year old, could get around it. They overruled 28 states, who had the decency to outlaw partial-birth abortions. Why didn't they just leave it up to the states?

        This satanist decision should make all pro-lifers work twice as hard to get Bush elected, because if Gore is elected, he will as Clinton did, veto the ban on this cruel procedure. Gore has also stated that he will appoint justices to the supreme court, who are pro-killing of unborn babies.

        Bush is pro-life and says he will NOT veto the ban. All other issues lumped together are not as important as saving the lives of these babies who are condemned to death, even without a trial. In our criminal courts an unanimous decision is needed for conviction and beyond a reasonable doubt. These precious babies get neither.

        This upcoming election will be the most important in the history of our country. It will be a battle between good and evil. Since Roe Vs Wade, our once Godly country has been sliding towards hell, at an alarming rate. The killing of unborn babies must stop if our country is to be saved. God MUST have a place in our society, as He once had.

        If Gore is elected, all evil continues and gets worse and our county will pass Sodom and Gomorrah in moral degeneracy -- if we haven't already and we all know their fate!


  • July 6, 2000
    volume 11, no. 117
    Pro-Life Prescriptions column


    Return to front page of current issue