Who Still Wants To Be in The Dark Ages?
Part Four of
CATHOLIC IDENTITY CRISIS IN THE USA
Because the shepherds were spineless, too many Catholics have been duped into believing the lies of liberal factions both within and outside of the modern church. This only confuses more poor misguided souls and adds to the consternation of those seeking to follow Catholic doctrine. The abortion industry thrives on this confusion.
"Liberals, pro-death, modernist, feminist and all of the other fools harp that the Catholic Church's policies will only serve to keep society in The Dark Ages, yet it is these same frauds that then spare no effort to keep modern technology out of the hands, eyes, and hearts of expectant mothers when that technology might actually stop an abortion. Like blood-thirsty vampires seeking innocent blood, these ghouls are frantic at the thought of losing one abortion to love. They prefer to ignore technological advances in order to maintain detestable, barbaric murder at any cost for their profit. Now who is actually trying to keep society in 'The Dark Ages'??"
One of the most common accusations leveled against the Catholic Church is that its traditional policies would do nothing more than keep society in "The Dark Ages". This kind of claim has been made by every fool, imbecile, moron, and clueless drone from the liberal media to dissident groups like 'Catholics' for Free Choice and others. The rhetoric implies that traditional Catholic doctrine is no more than a step apart from Inquisition tactics and policies meant to torture, enslave, and bully innocent, peace-loving souls into submission. The further implication made, of course, is that liberal, New Order, secular, feminist, sodomite, modernist agendas are all, in the profound words of these very same ghouls, enlightened reforms aimed at moving above and beyond ignorant, intolerant ranting. If, as these despicable hypocrites argue, the Catholic Church is seeking to keep society in the so-called Dark Ages, then will someone please explain what follows?
Pandora's Window turned Liberal Nightmare
Jill Stanek in WorldNetDaily.com reported on April 22nd of this year that a recent study has concluded that 79% of abortion-minded mothers change their mind upon viewing a 4D ultrasound image of their baby, which clearly proves that the "lump of tissue" or "reproductive discharge" that demons like Planned Parenthood portray the fetus to be is, can you believe it, an actual living, breathing human being! To the horror of these purveyors of death and sin, this powerful technology now more than ever contradicts and destroys their lies and distortions leaving them ripped bare for what they are…frauds from hell. It is bad enough for these demons of death that such technology is being used in pregnancy care centers, but an even more devastating development has these paragons of poison simply twisting in their brew of perdition.
It seems that commercial ultrasound establishments have begun to spring up in malls all over America. For a fee, expectant mothers and their loved ones can actually see the living fetus developing inside her and have keepsakes of that experience. To make matters worse, as any business would do, large images of such fetuses decorate the windows of said establishments just as large images of sports figures and lingerie models decorate athletic and lingerie shops. Imagine this bit of Pro-life propaganda lambasting the frauds and lies that underlie the abortion industry and pad its wallet!
Hypocrisy Thy Name is Death
Every pro-death advocate from Attorneys General Elliot Spitzer of New York to Lisa Madigan of Illinois has tried to stop this use of ultrasound for obvious reasons but, according to Jill Stanek, their efforts have not been successful until now. It seems that most of the commercial establishments are up to now relatively unregulated, and thus these pro-death advocates are now seeking to criminalize these businesses through legislation which even seeks to prevent many uses of ultrasounds in pregnancy care centers and prohibit doctors from referring patients for such keepsake purposes. Even though now risks from ultrasound have been demonstrated over the years, the FDA disapproves of such commercial use of ultrasounds. Pro-abort efforts such as that of Illinois Representative Rosemary Mulligan who, with the support of her state's Planned Parenthood, has introduced House Bill 2492, seek to stop the use of ultrasound for such purposes purportedly for safety reasons although everyone and anyone with half a brain knows that the real agenda here is to stop a damaging bit of safe technology that greatly dents the Pro-death litany of lies.
These are the very same people who refuse to allow legislation that seeks to regulate abortion murder mills aimed at decreasing health risks and increasing sanitation and safety because they do not want to put any limits of any kind on the genocide practiced by these ghouls on a daily basis. When legislation actually harms the pro-death agenda and helps the pro-life side, however, safety and regulation become critical purposes of course!
Two Standards of "What if"
Stanek's argument profoundly brings out typical liberal double-standard. There is so much research pointing to a possible link between breast cancer and abortion that Kelly Hollowell, JD, PhD, a scientist, patent attorney and adjunct professor of bioethics has written that she cannot in all conscience support The Susan G. Komen Foundation, which somehow has no problem fighting cancer and supporting Planned Parenthood. Considering the strong evidence supporting that link and that foundation's famous Race for a Cure fundraiser, Hollowell rightly wonders if the Komen Foundation is simply racing away from a real decrease in the problem that lines its fundraising pockets and purpose! So, it seems, pro-death forces ignore any "what if" that contradicts their agenda. However, we also find that if something serves their agenda, they will "what if" it to kingdom come. It is for this reason that pro-death forces relentlessly ask "what if" ultrasound is harmful to the mother or child? What they are really asking is "what if" this technology breaks our backs? We thus see that "what if" only works for the liberals if it serves their wretched, despicable, hypocritical purpose!
Two Standards of "Choice" But One Hypocrisy
So absurd is the hypocrisy of the pro-death forces' efforts to stop ultrasound on the supposed premise of its safety that even Chicago Tribune Columnist Eric Zorn has pointed out that "If we want to protect fetal health with strict new legislation, how about making it illegal for pregnant women to drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes?" Zorn rightly argues that given the FDA's disapproval of commercial ultrasound use, women should merely be given the reason for that FDA disapproval and allowed to make their own choice as to whether or not they will have an ultrasound for their own personal reasons. In other words, if women have the sacred right to privacy and choice that pro-aborts and all liberal hypocrites spew about, then why not allow them to have access to ultrasound technology for their own personal use and give them both the choice to decide if they want to use that technology and the respect that they will be able to make the best decision for them based on their own personal, private conscience and purposes?
The reason why pro-death, liberal, and feminist radicals do not want to give women this right is obvious. It would hurt their hellish agenda! Once again, we see that these vile purveyors of deception and hypocrisy will spew claims of choice and privacy and respect for "moral maturity" only when it serves their purpose of death but not when it actually inhibits, limits, or hinders that purpose!!
Hypocrisy Full Circle
Liberals, pro-death, modernist, feminist and all of the other fools harp that the Catholic Church's policies will only serve to keep society in The Dark Ages, yet it is these same frauds that then spare no effort to keep modern technology out of the hands, eyes, and hearts of expectant mothers when that technology might actually stop an abortion. Like blood-thirsty vampires seeking innocent blood, these ghouls are frantic at the thought of losing one abortion to love. They prefer to ignore technological advances in order to maintain detestable, barbaric murder at any cost for their profit. Now who is actually trying to keep society in "The Dark Ages"??
So many Catholics are confused about their identity with doctrine because the liberals have twisted and villainized true Catholic doctrine in favor of convenience. This has given a pulpit to the radical factions in the modern church because those who should be the guardians of the Faith have been too afraid to step on toes and lower the boom on heresy. That is the crux of the problem. If a parent doesn't rein in rebellious children, they will run amok and upset the hierarchy of the family, not to mention peace and order. This is what has happened in the Church where factions have decided they don't need to follow doctrine, but pick and choose what they want, while still calling themselves 'Catholic.' What makes things even worse is that they align with the enemies of the Church in railing against the "medieval thinking," which, when you think about it -solid Catholic "thinking" - read: doctrine - predated medieval times by, oh, a good millennium or so. But they love to associate the "Dark Ages" with the True Church to justify their own darkness.
And that darkness is immense. The more I witness the hypocrisy of liberals, feminists, sodomites, modernists, seculars, and atheists, the more physically sick I become. What usually and often spews out of their mouths is so much waste from the darkest depths of depravity and the minutest measure of rational, logical, decent thought. Ask one of these frantic frauds if a woman should be prohibited from access to technology that allows her to make a reproductive choice and they will all jump in the affirmative thinking that one is promoting abortion techniques. However, burst their bubble and tell them that this technology has often stopped abortions and they will jump in the negative. How decent, sincere, genuine and moral, is it not? When it comes to Dark Ages, those who promote death, sin, and perdition have never left!
NEXT: PART FIVE: E Pluribus Venom
Columns in this series thus far:
Editor's Note: Heaven is once again under attack by those who would seek to ignore and overthrow God's majesty and authority. Gabriel Garnica, educator and attorney, submits regular insights and commentaries to remind and help guide readers toward a deeper and more assertive faith. Touching on topics and issues ranging from personal faith, doctrine, education, scripture, the media, family life, morality, and values, Gabriel's notes are music to traditional ears but unpleasant tones to those who have bought into the misguided notions so prevalent and spreading in today's Catholic world.