A Maine lawmaker - and a Republican no less - Brian Duprey, recently introduced legislation that would prohibit abortions on unborn children who are determined to be homosexual. Duprey told the Portland Press Herald that he got the idea from a Rush Limbugh observation that the discovery of a homosexual gene would turn homosexual activists pro-Life overnight. First of all, we all know that the claim that homosexuality is genetic is total rubbish concocted by the sodomite lobby in a pathetic attempt to paint their cause as similar to race and the civil rights movement. Extensive research has shown that homosexuality is unstable, changeable, and highly impacted by cultural and social influences. This scientific fact, however, is denied by the sodomite lobby because it would destroy the race-civil rights connection that is at the core of their entire sodomite rights effort.
Despite these facts, some biased scientists claim that there is a genetic predisposition to homosexuality. Based on these ridiculous claims, then, we can expose the utter hypocrisy and sheer absurdity of the homosexual movement and liberal agendas.
Contortions of Choice
Pro-death forces use choice as their prime weapon in demanding that abortion be legal. They claim that a woman must have the right to determine if she has a child or not and that this freedom of choice and its corresponding privacy myth are critical and central to human integrity. These people also claim that the unborn child is not a separate person but merely a part of the mother like some tooth despite the scientific fallacy and weakness of that claim ( different DNA therefore different persons ). These fools also argue that homosexuality is stable, unchangeable, not arbitrary or partial, and clearly defined.
If one accepts the pathetic claims of homosexual and liberal forces one is faced with a logical contradiction. If it is true as pro-death people say that the unborn child is just a part of the mother and as pro-sodomites say that the homosexual trait is stable, clearly defined, and non-arbitrary, then a non-homosexual mother cannot have a homosexual child no more than one's left arm can be homosexual while one's right arm is not.
Now it is logical that only a non-homosexual mother would want to abort her child for being homosexual, but then a non-homosexual mother could not have a homosexual child if that child was merely a part of her like her arm. Given this logical conclusion, it is totally unnecessary to worry about protecting unborn homosexuals from mothers who want to eliminate them!
Superiority Not Equality
Duprey's absurd notion merely points out a fact about the homosexual movement. It does not seek equality but superiority! How can anyone claim that it is ok to kill an unborn child who is not homosexual but not ok to kill an unborn child who is? The only way would be to argue that homosexuality is somehow a special trait that entitles the holder to superior legal protections not offered to other groups. Sodomite rights people argue the 14th Ammendment, that provides equal protection under the law, as one of their weapons in seeking their rights. How can one argue equal protection while not providing that equal protection to anyone who is not in one's group? The obvious absurdity and hypocrisy of this argument is so plain as to be breathtaking.
Pro-Life No Matter What
Those who respect God's authority over life and creation argue against the abortion of even future idiots whose hypocrisy and biases inflict great harm on the ears, minds, eyes, and souls of those unfortunate enough to be inflicted with their trash. While it might be a great benefit to society, morality, and social order if these imbeciles were removed from the landing pattern of future generations, pro-life means what it says and does not start creating varying protections depending on perceived present or future status or concocted genetic traits. Unfortunately, pro-life means that even people like Brian Duprey deserve to be born and spill their rubbish on society. However, I personally want to thank Mr. Duprey because his mindless honesty allows us to see just how absurd, ridiculous, and hypocritical the sodomite lobby really is. Furthermore, this claim that abortion should not be allowed in certain cases only undermines the general liberal cry for unlimited abortion thereby revealing that there is indeed contradiction among sinners for contradiction is the condiment of Satan and Satan's claw is everywhere to be found among these denizens of damnation and purveyors of perdition.
Every time it seems that liberal and sodomite forces have found ground zero in absurdity and base immorality, they seem to discover a new path downward to hell. Not content with merely spewing sin, these people now lash it out in varying degrees and with varying application. If it were not for the tragic damage that these fools inflict, their continued mockery of common sense, logic, and decency would be a humorous circus of errors. Unfortunately, before God these clowns are not amusing.