January 25, 2005
Tuesday
vol 16, no. 25

WHY ONE CANNOT, IN GOOD FAITH, ATTEND THE NOVUS ORDO


    Because Pope Paul VI, when promulgating the New Mass, himself declared. "The rite ... by itself is NOT a dogmatic definition ..." (11/19/69)

So there you have the enabler of the synthetic service admitting that no one has to follow his 'wish' for it is NOT A DOGMATIC DEFINITION, but merely a pastoral recommendation - a very, ill-advised and , as we have seen over the past 35 years, fated and tragic direction, but nevertheless, holding no binding decree. Notice the difference here, folks? One, the Dogmatic infallible Council of Trent decrees demand that we adhere, whereas the pastoral-only documents and proclamations of and since Vatican II only make the suggestion. Which are you going to heed when it comes to your eternal salvation? One that is definite and absolute and carries with it the weight of the Holy Ghost and the wrath of God if disobeyed, or pleasing men just so everyone can get along in the spirit of the humanistic 'unity of community'? The answer is obvious but not to those blind ostriches who still have their stubborn heads stuck in the sands of the Novus Ordo. Wake up, my friends, before you are washed away in total apostasy. As we have been emphasizing over the past several years, Pope St. Pius V set in stone the everlasting celebret - a perpetual indult. No Bishop, no priest and no Pope can override that. PERIOD! To do so is to go against the Holy Catholic Church! We all know the Pope and the Bishops have done just that by denying the Traditional Latin Mass except on their terms and only if one accepts the synthetic New Order liturgy which has so defiled the true meaning of the Holy Sacrifice. Yet the church of Vatican II, the ecumaniacal hierarchy, like all in the curia including the one who appoints them - the Pope himself - are afraid to 'go public' with this vital truth so the people will know. Instead Catholics are told that a Latin Mass can only be said with the permission of the Bishop (Fat chance!) or a celebret from the Ecclesia Dei Commission, which, in fact, is illegal and unnecessary because of the perpetual celebret issued by St. Pius V that every priest for all time must say the unchangeable Mass of All Ages in the Mother tongue of the Church. The truth is the Pope and Bishops fear that were this knowledge acknowledged, there would be rightfully so a mass exodus from the Novus Ordo, not only by the laity but many priests. We can only pray that this will become more manifest as discussion continues over Gibson's film and his own beliefs which embrace all that was taught before Vatican II. This very coverup of the True Mass was outlined quite clearly by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (They Have Uncrowned Him and Open Letter to Confused Catholics), Atila Sinke Guimar„es, (The Murky Waters of Vatican II, Animus Delendi I and II) Romano Amerio (Iota Unum), Fr. Ralph Wiltgen (The Rhine Flows into the Tiber) and Father James Wathen in his irrefutable masterpiece The Great Sacrilege. They all document that the Traditional Latin Mass alone provides the divinely ordained formula for true vertical worship of the Triune Divinity. Every Catholic has a moral obligation to abandon the new false religion and return to the True tenets and practices of the Church as practiced from St. Peter through Pope Pius XII. Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani and Cardinal Antonio Bacci back on September 25, 1969 could see this all coming and warned of this in The Ottaviani Intervention As we know no Pope since Pius XII has listened to the wisdom of Holy Mother Church and for this stubborn, prideful promotion of the church of Vatican II have indeed "incurred the wrath of God and the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul." This is the fifty-fifth of 62 reasons submitted by the Priests of Campos on Easter Sunday 1982 and endorsed by the late great Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer. Each day we will publish one of the 62 until they're all complete.

    January 25, 2005
    vol 16, no. 25

    62 REASONS WHY NO to the NO!