January 17, 2005
Sunday
vol 16, no. 17

WHY ONE CANNOT, IN GOOD FAITH, ATTEND THE NOVUS ORDO


    Because the New mass embodies numerous errors condemned by Pope St. Pius V at the Council of Trent (Mass totally in vernacular, words of Consecration spoken aloud, etc. See Condemnation of Jansenist Synod of Pistia), and errors condemned by Pope Pius XII (e.g., altar in form of table. See Mediator Dei).

    Again, the very things that were condemned and accursed as anathema by wise and holy Pontiffs, by Holy Mother the Church are today elevated and given veracity as being noble and true in the newChurch. This is a contradiction that cannot hold water to the wine of truth. How can a doctrine or dogma be changed? It cannot. How can a dogmatic, sacred Council which pronounced with the Popes overseeing it, infallible doctrines - such as the Council of Trent be trumped by a pastoral-only council that was hijacked by progressivists, Protestants and the perverted? It is impossible. Therefore, every Catholic has a moral obligation to abandon the new false religion and return to the True tenets and practices of the Church as practiced from St. Peter through Pope Pius XII. Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani and Cardinal Antonio Bacci back on September 25, 1969 could see this all coming and warned of this inThe Ottaviani Intervention While the Pope didn't listen for the confirmed 33rd Degree Mason Annibale Bugnini had his ear and heart, he and the church of Vatican II have indeed "incurred the wrath of God and the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul." Father James Wathen could see this so clearly over 30 years ago and warned of all this in his irrefutable masterpiece The Great Sacrilege proving the immediate devastations that had occurred in just the few years of the New Order. Imagine then nearly 33 years later! Tragic! This is the forty-eighth of 62 reasons submitted by the Priests of Campos on Easter Sunday 1982 and endorsed by the late great Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer. Each day we will publish one of the 62 until they're all complete.

    January 17, 2005
    vol 16, no. 17

    62 REASONS WHY NO to the NO!