|
|
|
|
 Not everything which Paul narrates concerning the institution of the Eucharist (I Corinthians 11:23-25) is to be taken historically.
As usual the Modernists will try to strike at the heart of Christianity (read Catholic) by undermining the Holy Eucharist. Where, pray tell, do they have any proof of the ridiculous statement these intrepid infiltrators make in this 45th Error which His Holiness Saint Pius X identifies? They have none, but, as is always their modus operandi they sow doubt by making such bold false statements. Kind of like throwing darts up against the wall and see which ones stick. This dangerous dart should fall flat on its spindly little face in the face of the evidence that refutes such inane logic. First of all, Saint Paul who was struck from his horse on the way to Damascus by GOD, was a close associate of the very Apostles who were THERE at the Last Supper. They were eyewitnesses to exactly what our Lord said. So what is the problem? Ah, there are two reasons they attack this Epistle of St. Paul as being "historically" insufficient. One, the True Presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist, Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity is manifested in his words and this doesn't play well with Protestants who believe it is just a symbol. Modernists (read Vatican II conciliarists), in their ecumaniacal efforts to placate non-Catholics to please man, are more than willing to go along with the Protestant perception because, as statistics have shown time and time again, fewer and fewer believe in the True Presence. Thank you, Vatican II. Second, the passages that follow 23-25 are most telling for Paul warns of those who receive Communion unworthily. A grave offense to be sure and an even graver outrage is that the "Communion" isn't really Communion but an invalid, illicitly consecrated host that could not be confected because the exact canonical infallible words prescribed have been abandoned as His Holiness Saint Pius V infallible decreed "in perpetuity" in Quo Primum in codifying what the dogmatic, infallible Council of Trent decreed, and in the form and matter of valid consecration in De defectibus. As the late Father James Wathen has proven in The Great Sacrilege and Patrick Henry Omlor in his books, to mention but a few, when Giovanni Montini authorized the abominable change in the words of consecration and introduced the Protestant-Masonic-Zionist-Pagan Novus Ordo Missae he issued in what Christ foretold in St. Matthew 24: 15, the "abomination of desolation." Enough said!
|
|