|
|
|
|
In all the evangelical texts the name "Son of God'' is equivalent only to that of "Messias." It does not in the least way signify that Christ is the true and natural Son of God.
His Holiness St. Pius X was on top of things by indicating this error of Modernism. So cleverly do the Modernists twist things that unless one knows their Faith, they can easily be led astray by the verbal engineering of Modernists which the conciliarists hae seemingly perfected except they can't help but continue to contradict themselves and therein is the proof of the pudding, in a matter of speaking. "Son of God" means exactly what Christ intended. The Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, One God in three Persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Again, what part of the Gospels do these zanies, who promulgate this error, read? It is crystal clear that Messias means the true and natural Son of God, immaculately conceived in the womb of the most pure tabernacle God could have chosen - the Blessed Virgin Mary, and miraculously brought forth on the wood of the manger among the sheep as the God-man, the promised Messias of the Old Testament, the true and natural Son of God. He would verify that on the wood of the cross and His subsequent Resurrection and Ascension, after which He would send His Spirit to divinely inspire His apostles and disciples to know and preach the truth and warn many times of those who would deceive, wolves in sheep's clothing. Wouldn't you think the Modernists would have the humility to recognize that and flee from their error-filled beliefs that can only lead to damnation? You would think so and you would pray for that, but those whose hearts are hardened are cold and indifferent to the truth.
|
|