|
|
In Colorado, a trial is underway to determine the guilt or innocence of fellows who killed another simply because of his sexual orientation. We don't know whether the boy they killed practiced homosexual acts. Even if he did, they had no right to take his life.
"Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her" (John 8: 7). "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us" (Our Father).
No doubt these fellows thought they were doing good, or at least, nothing wrong. After all, homosexuality is a sin which cries to Heaven for revenge. Thing is, it isn't ours to enact that revenge.
We know of those who feel it is right and good to kill abortion doctors, to blow up abortion clinics, etc. In these cases, we can't even judge their final outcome, but can only pray for their repentance and conversion.
So here, we see evil disguised as a good. But there are others less noticeable. A group of people are hated, almost the world over. Their leaders are corrupt, many are poor. Along comes some men who give them pride in themselves. They sweep away the corruption, put people back to work. The homeless find homes, and the anarchy of riots in the street are replaced with law and order. Finally, they think, someone who takes responsibility, who cares for us. Sounds like a good person doesn't he? That person was Adolf Hitler.
"From 1921 Hitler, scorning consistency or truth, adapted his views to the audience and grievance of the moment. His Nazis appealed to all the discontented and uprooted, and to the middle class, ruined by the currency collapse, they promised economic reforms. Capitalists were assured of protection against Communism; workers were guaranteed jobs by a Nazi regime. Monarchists were led to hope in a restoration of the throne. Patriots were aroused by denunciation of the Versailles 'dictated peace,' and the continuing German political and military inferiority among nations. Youth were inveigled by insignia, marching, noise, games."
While coming to power, Hitler showed himself the champion of the people, ALL of the people. But we know now that he really championed only some of the people, those people who followed him. And even they were abandoned by him as not being worthy to survive him (for losing the war).
Much of his rhetoric is echoing throughout the world today. Not against Jews, but against those who would obstruct their march to empowerment.
Among various feminist and homosexual groups, among others, tolerance is preached, but tolerance only for those who follow, lock step, with them. Any Christian (especially Catholics) who fail to follow are ridiculed and berated. A 'good' Christian (Catholic) is one who follows exactly as they should.
"The religious counterpart of Nazism, the "German Christians," with varying degrees of enthusiasm called for a "positive, virile, Aryan Christianity." Their candidate for Reichs-bischof, Chaplain Ludwig Mueller, received Hitler's endorsement as against the German Evangelical Federation. In July, 1933, this Federation was legally replaced by a "German Evangelical Church," a centralized body to be "coordinated" by Mueller. But a "New Reformation movement" of twenty-five hundred Lutheran ministers objected to the anti-Semitism of the new church, and were upheld in their stand by Protestant ecumenical groups. Later "German Christian" demands for rewriting the Bible and removal of the cross provoked a "Pastors' Evangelical League" led by Martin Niemoller. Its leaders were arrested or exiled and all Protestant opposition forced underground by 1938. Finally the Reichsbischof was supplanted by a lay minister of religion, Hans Kerrl, who demanded a "Nordic Christianity" while Rosenberg campaigned for a "National Reich Church" with a thirty-point program involving pure paganism or pantheism."
Sounds somewhat familiar? Replace obstructive 'pastors' with those more to their liking. Especially lay ministers and priest, with the addition of gnosticism, New Age practices, etc. After all, there are many ways to God, right?
By 1935, Hitler had all but gutted the Catholic Church in Germany. "Persecution of the Church began in earnest in 1935 and proved severe despite Nazi disclaimers of its existence. At first every effort was made to discredit the clergy by cartoons, loud-speaking trucks, 'exposes,' and trials of clerics for alleged moral lapses. Chanceries were searched for incriminating documents, communication with Rome hindered, mails and phones tapped. Fines and imprisonment were inflicted upon outspoken clerics, but though the Nazis claimed 7,000 convictions, actually of 25,634 German priests but 49 were accused and 21 convicted of moral frailty, Nazi propaganda represented the Church as unpatriotic, hoarding wealth; its clerics as idle and avaricious."
Again, sound familiar? "From the beginning the Catholic Church was one of the main targets of Hitler's policy of annihilation; the totalitarian aims of National Socialism would not tolerate any opposition or allow any other organization to compete for the loyalty of the German people" (FAITH AND FATHERLAND by Thomas McGovern; the story of the heroic resistance of Count Clement August von Galen; bishop of Munster).
Many of the first inhabitants of Dachau weren't Jews, but Germans who 'opposed' and posed a threat to the good of the German people. But the Germans honestly thought that Hitler was bringing them good, not evil. That he was a savior, not a demon. By 1945, they knew the horrible truth, far too late.
I recently saw a debate (I believe on C-SPAN) between two women. A feminist and another woman. The feminist claimed that she was fighting for the rights and dignity of all women, but what was shown was that, in truth, she was fighting only for those women who followed her agenda. Many women (and men) have been deluded (as the Germans were) that unfortunate occurrences are bound to happen in their fight for freedom, dignity, and power. Though they dislike their methods, at least they are fighting for women. The same can be said for many homosexuals. "It's terrible what tactics Act Up uses, but hey, at least they're doing something for us." Just like the Germans before them, they've accepted the Big Lie and closed their eyes to the truth.
This is the nature of evil. It never comes with horns. It's often finally recognized only after the damage is done. What many Germans saw as a good, ended with the almost total annihilation of Germany. It's hidden in sweet sounding words and concepts.
"But the serpent said to the woman, 'You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.' So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband, and he ate" (Genesis 3: 4-6).
Sounds good doesn't it? Can't we easily reword it for today? "That's not fair, keeping you from this one tree!! You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
Satan tried to tempt Christ by sounding good. He offered Him bread when He was hungry, he offered Him a chance to prove to the world that He was God, and he even offered to relinquish his hold on the world if Christ would bend a bit. (ref. Matt. 4: 1-11) It sounded so good. No need to suffer, what good He could do with the world His. But in every case, there was a catch, a price to pay. It sounded good, but if one looked closely, one could see the trap. " 'The whole world lies under the power of the evil one' (1 John 5:19) - allude also to the presence of satan in the history of humanity, a presence which becomes all the more acute when man and society depart from God" (John Paul II; General Audience, Aug. 13, 1986).
Since it behooves satan to get people to think he doesn't exist, is it any wonder that people would find themselves saying "We more enlightened know that satan is only the personification of our personal evil" (Fr. Richard McBrien).
While reading a debate between St. Augustine and Fortunatus (a Manichaean) I was struck by how the same tact was used by Fortunatus as is used by Modernists. "FORTUNATUS said: Because I know that you have been in our midst, that is, have lived as an adherent among the Manichaeans, these are the principles of our faith. The matter now to be considered is our mode of living, the falsely alleged crimes for which we are maltreated. Therefore let the good men present hear from you whether these things with which we are charged and which we have thrown in our teeth are true or false. For from your instruction, and from your exposition and explanation, they will have been able to gain more correct information about our mode of life, if it shall have been set forth by you.
2. AUGUSTIN said: I was among you, but faith and morals are different questions. I proposed to discuss faith. But if those present prefer to hear about morals, I do not decline that question." (St. Augustine; ACTS OR DISPUTATION AGAINST FORTUNATUS, THE MANICHAEAN).
This very modern, replace faith with morals, and of course, WE can't judge morals, especially if we don't know Christ. So Christ is quietly, slowly expunged to allow a more 'liberal' interpretation of faith, morals, and religion.
From Fr. William Most, Ph. D., we read some of the main 'adaptations' of
modernist thought.
"They often say things do not mean what they seem to mean, but are
They are fond of claiming retrojection: e.g., the strong words of Jesus to
the Pharisees were mostly not spoken --later in the century Christians and
Jews began to quarrel.
Consider the aim of satan, of evil. It's to take us away from God, Who
loves us. A line from the movie "Hook" is very appropriate, what better
revenge than turning one's own children against their father? So satan comes
as an angel of light, tickling our ears about fairness, enlightenment, the
divinity of mankind, the power of mankind to change things himself. So, he
prowls through the world seeking to ruin souls, to rob God of His treasure,
His love.
So we hear, seemingly good and logical things being repeated to lure
people away. In the 'kinder, gentler' world we can hear:
"You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will
be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
" Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the
kingdoms of the world and the glory of them; and he said to him, "All these
I will give you"
We are all called to follow God. To be compassionate to all men, saint
and sinner alike. To look after their welfare as a brother or sister. To
help them overcome what keeps them from Christ, as we hope they would help
us. But we must be very careful to discern the spirit. Is it truly from
God, or is it a distortion? A false compassion (such as euthenasia) a false
welfare (like abortion) and false help (such as supporting illicit
sexuality)?
There is a saying that whoever does not learn from history is doomed to
repeat it. Aren't we in danger of repeating the mistakes of the German
people in the 1930's? Aren't we accepting the 'purging' of those who do not
toe the line? Aren't we close to replacing the cross of Christ with a new
sort of swastika?
"For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves
as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an
angel of light. So it is not strange if his servants also disguise
themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their
deeds" (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15).
"But even if we, or an angel from Heaven, should preach to you a gospel
contrary to that which we preached to you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).
Don't be angry with those who follow these false teachers, but as Christ
would do, try and lovingly bring them back to the truth.
"My brethren, if any one among you wanders from the truth and some one
brings him back, let him know that whoever brings back a sinner from the
error of his way will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of
sins" (James 5: 19-20).
Pax Christi, Pat
Patriarch Raphael I Bidawid told the Vatican news agency Fides that the time required to organize the visit precludes the visit until after the new year. "There is no longer time to organize a visit for the start of December, and now we expect Father (Roberto) Tucci to come in mid-November," Bidawid said. Father Tucci leads the papal advance team that travels to future papal visit sites to organize the trip with local officials.
The patriarch continued, "If Father Tucci had been able to come in early October perhaps the Pope could have come in December, but this was impossible because of preparations for the Holy Father's journey to India and Georgia, and the organization of the Pope's pilgrimage to us was postponed. But we are confident he will come!"
The Holy Father intends to travel Iraq to visit Ur, the birthplace of the biblical patriarch Abraham, but several Western nations and Iraqi dissident groups have urged him to cancel the trip. Some groups believe Iraqi President Saddam Hussein will use the papal visit to pressure the international community to lift economic sanctions.
Some internal elements in the Iraqi government had also contributed to problems for the visit. A group of academics, connected to members of the regime, had released an open letter critical of the Pope and intimating that he was unaware of the effects of the UN embargo on children. The Holy Father has repeatedly, publicly voiced his opinion that the embargoes unfairly harm innocents in Iraq.
The US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals voted 5-4 ruled that the bans passed by Illinois and Wisconsin are constitutional. Thirty states have passed bans, but in 20 cases courts have overruled or restricted them. Pro-abortion groups have vowed to appeal the appeals court's decision. Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee, said the Supreme Court would perhaps review an appeal next year.
The decision reversed a ruling by a federal judge in Chicago that held the Illinois law unconstitutional as well as an appeals panel's order that temporarily halted enforcement of the Wisconsin statute. "We conclude that both laws can be enforced in a constitutional manner," Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote for the majority. The court added that additional laws could circumvent opponents' charges that the bans would be used to punish abortionists for performing otherwise legal abortions.
Last month, a federal appeals court in St. Louis struck down similar laws in Nebraska, Arkansas, and Iowa, setting up the Supreme Court review to settle the differences.
The inter-religious prayer service was held on the 13th anniversary of the historic occasion when Pope John Paul II gathered leaders of many different faiths to Assisi for a day of prayer for peace.
After the different religious leaders toured the Basilica of St. Francis--which has been extensively renovated since an earthquake two years ago-- Cardinal Francis Arinze convened their prayer meeting in the lower church. He introduced a Franciscan priest, Father Guenole Jeusset, who remarked that the gathering was taking place in an appropriate site. "St. Francis did not abolish the differences among religions, but he tore down the walls between them," the Franciscan argued.
The gathering concluded when a Buddhist monk offered Cardinal Arinze a parchment containing the signatures of all the participants, as an indication of their thanks to the Vatican for hosting the meeting. Before a final dinner, the participants paused for a moment of prayer at the tomb of St. Francis in the crypt of the Basilica.
The religious leaders spent the afternoon in tours of the region. They were scheduled to return to Rome for a meeting with Pope John Paul II on Thursday, October 28, before heading back to their respective homes.
The Wanderer newspaper reported this week that the cardinal gave an unscheduled address at the NACDLGM conference opening. For his decision not to cancel the conference, as had been requested by many faithful Catholics, the cardinal received a standing ovation as he approached the microphone. But the enthusiasm was severely dampened as he presented an orthodox message calling the organization to submit to the Church's teaching against homosexual sex.
The cardinal said that the conference "could not be to criticize or mount a movement against" the Vatican's teaching, nor would it be "a gathering place for Dignity and others who are publicly opposed to Church teaching." He further stated that the "Church's teaching, the teaching of Jesus Christ, from Divine Revelation [is that] the gift of human sexuality is oriented toward uniting a man and woman in marriage for life, for their own unity in Christ and for the giving of new life to children."
"That teaching," he said, "will not change because it cannot change, based as it is in faith and in human nature itself. To deny that the power of God's grace enables homosexuals to live chastely is to deny, effectively, that Jesus has risen from the dead."
The cardinal warned the NACDLGM members that the "organization is at a crossroads. You are without an episcopal moderator; when you ask for another, you will have to explain who you are and make clear your purpose and your goals in the Church."
